A mathematician, Abraham Wald, pointed out that perhaps the reason certain areas of the planes weren’t covered in bullet holes was that planes that were shot in certain critical areas did not return.
This insight led to the armor being re-enforced on the parts of returning planes where there were no bullet holes. This wisdom was also beneficially applied to the Skyraider during the Korean War.
This shows that the reasons why we are missing certain data may be more meaningful than the available data, itself.
So, in all the many questions we ask here on GAW, don’t only listen to what the evidence says, listen also to what is not being said.
Any good study of Hitler's life shows that he was not a "puppet." I have read more books on Hitler than I can count. He was his own man, regrettably.
A long string of questions is only a long string of questions. Some of it is frivolous (the Titanic? the Hindenburg?). Ultimately, the ability to ask a lot of questions does NOT imply the ability to answer them. (Why is the sky blue? Why are the colors of a secondary rainbow in reverse order to those of a primary rainbow?)
Weird take on Q's presentation style given the website you are typing on.
I think I've read more on Hitler than Q has. Getting ahead of one's knowledge is par for the course on this website. Or it is not exactly disinformation, but a way to point noses.
You are too infatuated with the world Clowns have constructed for you. Understand the importance of Comms. Reconcile with Hitler having been a Communications officer in WWI.
"The truth would send 99% to the hospital". You don't get to that % without stripping away beliefs that we hold to be fundamentally true.
One of those truths? That nuclear bombs actually exist.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
You keep changing the subject. I think we can retire the adulation for Q's cryptic remarks in relation to Hitler (not necessarily being about Hitler). You leap into unfounded conjecture in place of anything substantial (having substance). I'm not infatuated with much at all, not nearly so much as you are infatuated with the Rorschach-blot-reading world of "comms." What you think is "decoding" is more accurately "pareidolia." Look it up.
Hitler was a "communications officer"? He was a corporal and was a runner of field messages from the front to the rear echelon. Apart from his bravery under fire, that had no place in his political life.
I think "the truth would send 99% to the hospital" is either a misquote or hyperbole. I am willing to agree that stark reality ("the truth") would send nearly all paranoid psychotics to the mental hospital---but don't rejoice; that would include a lot of people who show up on this page. ("You mean, reptilians DON'T exist?")
People have known since 1945 that nuclear bombs exist. My father walked through the ruins of Nagasaki. I have samples of trinitite given to me by a colleague, whose father was a test photographer during the Manhattan Project and afterward. Plenty of open atomic testing through the 1950s. Half of my career was based on designing systems to defeat nuclear weapons. It is only here, among the profoundly psychotic, that I have heard allegations of there being no atomic bombs. (Here's another one: volcanoes erupt. Seems academic, until it occurs on your doorstep, 'a la Mount St. Helens.) Mentally-healthy people adapt to all kinds of truth, especially life-or-death truth.
I mistrust the "we have to keep secrets from you for your own good" line of B.S. There are secrets that have to be kept in order for activities and systems to be unknown. The requirement for moral integrity is very high and the consensus of secrecy must be impeccable. This sloppy talk about dangerous secrets is more melodrama than reality. I'm sorry to say it, but it does create a backlog of "you gotta lotta 'splaining to do, Lucy."
I can't find the thread this is from, so I can't respond to a cryptic question that has no connection with reality.
More questions? No answers. Read. Learn.
Yep, lots of questions. No possibility of having answers. You will always be the blind man at the elephant.