Um... so we should just have mob rule? Just let everyone interpret the constitution on their own? Let liberals decide what is and isn't a "right" willy nilly? What exactly is your complaint here?
It's not ambiguous. Unfortunately, many of the laws that have passed either partially or entirely infringe upon one amendment or another, and that's what those priests of law have to interpret against the Constitution. It's stupid and lame that it's needed.
Um... so we should just have mob rule? Just let everyone interpret the constitution on their own? Let liberals decide what is and isn't a "right" willy nilly? What exactly is your complaint here?
Yeah because the constitution is just so damn ambiguous it requires special priests of law to be interpreted correctly.
It's not ambiguous. Unfortunately, many of the laws that have passed either partially or entirely infringe upon one amendment or another, and that's what those priests of law have to interpret against the Constitution. It's stupid and lame that it's needed.
No. More in the sense that this should never have been something that needed a court case from the start.
Uhhhhhh............. they're black-robed British nobles?