Liberate the dogs from their insane vets!! And there is no such VIRUS. We have exactly the same amount of documented scientific evidence of Leprechauns as we do of the rabies virus --- ZILCH.
The ILLNESS that was diagnosed long before Pasteur the madman came around was called "Hydrophobia" (fear of water) as a tiny handful of patients who had suffered a vicious dog or wild animal attack were literally afraid to drink fluids a few days/weeks/months/years after the event. Quite perplexing to say the least.
I've studied about 5 documented cases of hydrophobia from the literature pre-dating 1870 (when Pasteur arrived on the scene). I've also researched all the rabies trials during Pasteur's era (where he fudged the numbers constantly). Surprise, surprise, the "establishment" rejected, suppressed and ignored the many dozens of doctors who thought the rabies jab was not only worthless, but quite often HARMFUL and sometimes DEADLY to the recipient. Kinda like now, eh?
One interesting example is that several of the doctors at that time did research into dog catchers (which was a thing back in the day 1900-1930) and found that these dog catchers had been bitten thousands of times by "rabid" dogs, but none ever "got rabies", nor took any shots. Hard to explain that away, eh?
Regarding the 5 older cases. The most fascinating is two boys who were viciously attacked and received multipole bits by the same dog at the same time in France around 1850. The first boy died of "hydrophobia" about two weeks later, but the second boy had shipped out to America a few days after the incident and lived there for twenty years before finally returning to France. When he arrived in France, he eventually learned of the fate of his friend which he had not heard while in America. A week after hearing of his friends untimely death, he too succumbed to hydrophobia. I wish there were more details, but very interesting nonetheless, eh?
Another case was of a man who died of hydrophobia some 30 years after he was attacked by a wolf. He was effectively a psychological basket case for about a two week period, unwilling to drink water, unable to open his mouth, refusing food/fluids and regularly and irrationally mumbling about the 30-year old wolf attack. The doctors could do nothing for him as he withered away.
I believe this ailment, called "hydrophobia" originally was a much more accurate assessment than the fake virus theory, as it is a psychological one. Being attacked by a wild animal or dog is incredibly traumatic and I can think of few other events in life that would be more traumatic. It happens over the course of several minutes often, and it must be incredibly frightening to endure.
I believe (can't prove) that what is going on psychologically is of a most primal nature. And that is, the human is effectively unable to defend himself while under attack. In short, the human is unable to "bite back", at the most primal level. We lack the equipment/behavior to defend against the attack and this causes a deep psychological shock.
As you may know, our psyche protects us when we are involved in a highly traumatic event, effectively burying the memory until it feels we are finally able to process it fully. This is extremely common with children that are victims of sexual abuse and also with veterans of war that were involved in extremely violent combat. Memory suppression is a powerful defense mechanism.
Now, what every few know is that the resolution of a trauma/conflict involves "re-living the event" in order to finally process and release the memory. It's part of the healing stage of any disease. Having to psychologically re-live the dog/animal attack would be incredibly intense, especially after years or decades. My guess would be it's much more difficult as more time passes, and easier for those who can resolve it within a few days/weeks of the attack.
So this part is 100% my own theory now as I have not seen anybody else speculate on what "rabies" might really be about. I believe that the strange behavior around not wanting to drink, not wanting to eat, etc. is a temporary PARALYSIS of the mouth/larynx/throat region, in effect replaying the attack while being unable to "bite back" and defend oneself. It's like our primal "bite reflex" has been lost in evolution although our old reptilian brain still wants to activate in order to defend. Crazy, eh? That's the best working theory I have at the moment based on all the published literature I can find.
The modern scientific literature on rabies is scant and low on detail. Virtually 99% of the population around the world gets a rabies shot after a dog attack nowadays. And just like in the past, a tiny percentage succumb regardless.
Lastly, it's worth noting that there were roughly 50 cases of hydrophobia deaths per year reported in France, Germany (Prussia) and England in the decades preceding the emergence of Pasteur. After he drummed up his poison jab, the numbers skyrocketed to between 2500 and 5000 deaths per year. If nothing else, this should be all you really need to know to reconsider things.
The actual "rabid dog" is a simple explanation by comparison. These dogs are suffering from one of three things (or multiple) - starvation, abusive treatment and/or poisoning. This is painfully obvious to anybody who cares to look at the evidence with an open mind. The fact that the human population is brainwashed into rushing their kids to the hospital for a highly gruesome and painful round of rabies shots every time Fido the family dog nips one of them matches up quite perfectly with the insanity we are seeing today with the ConVid jab. It's the height of absurdity!!!
And I can guarantee that some of these kids who get the multiple rounds on rabies jabs suffer some serious trauma along the way. This is also my working theory around autism. The anti-vax crowd presses on with their theory of neurotoxins being the culprit. While I can't discount this as a possibility, it just doesn't make sense scientifically. If a bunch of kids in the same neighborhood or that see the same pediatrician all suddenly got autism after their routine MMR jab, then the neurotoxin theory would make some sense. But this never happens. It's always completely RANDOM. One kid gets the MMR in Detroit, another kid gets the DPT in New York at a different time, another kid takes the HPV in LA at a different time etc. Different places, different times, different jabs, different ages, etc. While at the same time, it's simple to demonstrate that other kids in those localities took the same jab, from the same "batch" around the same time, but didn't become autistic.
My working theory on the autism scourge is that some of these kids suffer an anger/fear/betrayal trauma DURING THE JAB EVENT itself. These are kids that have suffered some other type of conflict prior to, and it is this second trauma event they are unable to understand/process (why is my mother, my protector letting them do these horrible things to me?) which leads their psyche to bury the memory by suppressing a region of the brain that assists with what we would call "normal functioning". If you've ever watched a very young child heavily scream and suffer through a round of jabs, you'd know what I mean. It's horrific to watch.
Anyway - believe it or not, I could say a lot more but that should suffice for now. You can view my many other comments the past week or so regarding how we now definitively know that nobody has even demonstrated the existence of a virus in any rational and realistic way.
What do you think? Crazy? Impossible? Possible? Probable?
You are a wise individual. Glad you allowed this tiny seed to be planted.
Here's a good video on the non-existence of viruses in general, not specifically about rabies. It's 2 hours and 20 minutes of solid information for your consideration. It probably took me 1000 hours plus of research to learn what's nicely summed up in it -> "The Viral Delusion"
Liberate the dogs from their insane vets!! And there is no such VIRUS. We have exactly the same amount of documented scientific evidence of Leprechauns as we do of the rabies virus --- ZILCH.
The ILLNESS that was diagnosed long before Pasteur the madman came around was called "Hydrophobia" (fear of water) as a tiny handful of patients who had suffered a vicious dog or wild animal attack were literally afraid to drink fluids a few days/weeks/months/years after the event. Quite perplexing to say the least.
I've studied about 5 documented cases of hydrophobia from the literature pre-dating 1870 (when Pasteur arrived on the scene). I've also researched all the rabies trials during Pasteur's era (where he fudged the numbers constantly). Surprise, surprise, the "establishment" rejected, suppressed and ignored the many dozens of doctors who thought the rabies jab was not only worthless, but quite often HARMFUL and sometimes DEADLY to the recipient. Kinda like now, eh?
One interesting example is that several of the doctors at that time did research into dog catchers (which was a thing back in the day 1900-1930) and found that these dog catchers had been bitten thousands of times by "rabid" dogs, but none ever "got rabies", nor took any shots. Hard to explain that away, eh?
Regarding the 5 older cases. The most fascinating is two boys who were viciously attacked and received multipole bits by the same dog at the same time in France around 1850. The first boy died of "hydrophobia" about two weeks later, but the second boy had shipped out to America a few days after the incident and lived there for twenty years before finally returning to France. When he arrived in France, he eventually learned of the fate of his friend which he had not heard while in America. A week after hearing of his friends untimely death, he too succumbed to hydrophobia. I wish there were more details, but very interesting nonetheless, eh?
Another case was of a man who died of hydrophobia some 30 years after he was attacked by a wolf. He was effectively a psychological basket case for about a two week period, unwilling to drink water, unable to open his mouth, refusing food/fluids and regularly and irrationally mumbling about the 30-year old wolf attack. The doctors could do nothing for him as he withered away.
I believe this ailment, called "hydrophobia" originally was a much more accurate assessment than the fake virus theory, as it is a psychological one. Being attacked by a wild animal or dog is incredibly traumatic and I can think of few other events in life that would be more traumatic. It happens over the course of several minutes often, and it must be incredibly frightening to endure.
I believe (can't prove) that what is going on psychologically is of a most primal nature. And that is, the human is effectively unable to defend himself while under attack. In short, the human is unable to "bite back", at the most primal level. We lack the equipment/behavior to defend against the attack and this causes a deep psychological shock.
As you may know, our psyche protects us when we are involved in a highly traumatic event, effectively burying the memory until it feels we are finally able to process it fully. This is extremely common with children that are victims of sexual abuse and also with veterans of war that were involved in extremely violent combat. Memory suppression is a powerful defense mechanism.
Now, what every few know is that the resolution of a trauma/conflict involves "re-living the event" in order to finally process and release the memory. It's part of the healing stage of any disease. Having to psychologically re-live the dog/animal attack would be incredibly intense, especially after years or decades. My guess would be it's much more difficult as more time passes, and easier for those who can resolve it within a few days/weeks of the attack.
So this part is 100% my own theory now as I have not seen anybody else speculate on what "rabies" might really be about. I believe that the strange behavior around not wanting to drink, not wanting to eat, etc. is a temporary PARALYSIS of the mouth/larynx/throat region, in effect replaying the attack while being unable to "bite back" and defend oneself. It's like our primal "bite reflex" has been lost in evolution although our old reptilian brain still wants to activate in order to defend. Crazy, eh? That's the best working theory I have at the moment based on all the published literature I can find.
The modern scientific literature on rabies is scant and low on detail. Virtually 99% of the population around the world gets a rabies shot after a dog attack nowadays. And just like in the past, a tiny percentage succumb regardless.
Lastly, it's worth noting that there were roughly 50 cases of hydrophobia deaths per year reported in France, Germany (Prussia) and England in the decades preceding the emergence of Pasteur. After he drummed up his poison jab, the numbers skyrocketed to between 2500 and 5000 deaths per year. If nothing else, this should be all you really need to know to reconsider things.
The actual "rabid dog" is a simple explanation by comparison. These dogs are suffering from one of three things (or multiple) - starvation, abusive treatment and/or poisoning. This is painfully obvious to anybody who cares to look at the evidence with an open mind. The fact that the human population is brainwashed into rushing their kids to the hospital for a highly gruesome and painful round of rabies shots every time Fido the family dog nips one of them matches up quite perfectly with the insanity we are seeing today with the ConVid jab. It's the height of absurdity!!!
And I can guarantee that some of these kids who get the multiple rounds on rabies jabs suffer some serious trauma along the way. This is also my working theory around autism. The anti-vax crowd presses on with their theory of neurotoxins being the culprit. While I can't discount this as a possibility, it just doesn't make sense scientifically. If a bunch of kids in the same neighborhood or that see the same pediatrician all suddenly got autism after their routine MMR jab, then the neurotoxin theory would make some sense. But this never happens. It's always completely RANDOM. One kid gets the MMR in Detroit, another kid gets the DPT in New York at a different time, another kid takes the HPV in LA at a different time etc. Different places, different times, different jabs, different ages, etc. While at the same time, it's simple to demonstrate that other kids in those localities took the same jab, from the same "batch" around the same time, but didn't become autistic.
My working theory on the autism scourge is that some of these kids suffer an anger/fear/betrayal trauma DURING THE JAB EVENT itself. These are kids that have suffered some other type of conflict prior to, and it is this second trauma event they are unable to understand/process (why is my mother, my protector letting them do these horrible things to me?) which leads their psyche to bury the memory by suppressing a region of the brain that assists with what we would call "normal functioning". If you've ever watched a very young child heavily scream and suffer through a round of jabs, you'd know what I mean. It's horrific to watch.
Anyway - believe it or not, I could say a lot more but that should suffice for now. You can view my many other comments the past week or so regarding how we now definitively know that nobody has even demonstrated the existence of a virus in any rational and realistic way.
What do you think? Crazy? Impossible? Possible? Probable?
All of those; I don't know what to think. Good info though, worth further research
I never reject or believe anything any more without digging
You are a wise individual. Glad you allowed this tiny seed to be planted.
Here's a good video on the non-existence of viruses in general, not specifically about rabies. It's 2 hours and 20 minutes of solid information for your consideration. It probably took me 1000 hours plus of research to learn what's nicely summed up in it -> "The Viral Delusion"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jajyAdPMdzfJ/