I mean... Isn't that kinda the point though, plausible deniability? Agree, if in this blinking video, Biden had a giant Q sign behind him would be the cherry, but really?
So out of 5000 or so Q posts, the word 'blink' only appears one time, that happens to be on July 25, 4 years ago.
On that same day 4 years later, video of Biden goes viral because he doesn't blink for a record amount of time, AND his eyes are WIDE OPEN, matching other part of post, which is also extremely uncharacteristic of how he usually looks, not to mention his voice in that video was way off ..
if anything, this is probably one of the strongest I've seen in a while.
There really is only 2 possibilities, One is Q team are fully in control, or Cabal are fucking with us, to make us think Q team has full control.
'BLINKED' in the Q post related to the EU and the tariffs (deals). Basically they conceded rather quickly to Trump. Eyes Open is a common phrase that relates to Putin and Trump meeting in regards to the larger importance and context between the two meeting. And you can see why now that is important especially with what is currently going on in Ukraine.
Q team has always been in control, no doubt, but some of these 'connections' or 'proofs' on this greatawakening.win forum are seemingly making extraordinarily loose connections & spinning them as 'fact' or what Q originally intended and people go along with it. I understand people are new and excited on here but Q proofs are either incredibly obvious, requires substantially deeper research or requires expanding your thinking (levels) based on the type of question Q asked. When we were on 8chan making these types of connections, it required going far beyond what you can simply find on wikipedia and a few other mainstream sources. Sometimes it's not what is 'explicitly' being said, but what is implied (or code).
For example, post 1012: "CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START]."
Was eventually answered in post 1113 when an anon made the connection to Syria false flag. Q responded, "Finally. Chemicals. Learn our comms."
I get it, but previous comms could still be used as a nod to anons that the plan is still in full effect and hold the line, by using them as future deltas as well.
Or as I said someone fucking with us.
It's a pretty damn strong plausibly deniable coincidence IMO.
I mean... Isn't that kinda the point though, plausible deniability? Agree, if in this blinking video, Biden had a giant Q sign behind him would be the cherry, but really?
So out of 5000 or so Q posts, the word 'blink' only appears one time, that happens to be on July 25, 4 years ago.
On that same day 4 years later, video of Biden goes viral because he doesn't blink for a record amount of time, AND his eyes are WIDE OPEN, matching other part of post, which is also extremely uncharacteristic of how he usually looks, not to mention his voice in that video was way off ..
if anything, this is probably one of the strongest I've seen in a while.
There really is only 2 possibilities, One is Q team are fully in control, or Cabal are fucking with us, to make us think Q team has full control.
Could have been one of those eye speculums that are used to keep your eyes open during exams/procedures.
'BLINKED' in the Q post related to the EU and the tariffs (deals). Basically they conceded rather quickly to Trump. Eyes Open is a common phrase that relates to Putin and Trump meeting in regards to the larger importance and context between the two meeting. And you can see why now that is important especially with what is currently going on in Ukraine.
Q team has always been in control, no doubt, but some of these 'connections' or 'proofs' on this greatawakening.win forum are seemingly making extraordinarily loose connections & spinning them as 'fact' or what Q originally intended and people go along with it. I understand people are new and excited on here but Q proofs are either incredibly obvious, requires substantially deeper research or requires expanding your thinking (levels) based on the type of question Q asked. When we were on 8chan making these types of connections, it required going far beyond what you can simply find on wikipedia and a few other mainstream sources. Sometimes it's not what is 'explicitly' being said, but what is implied (or code).
For example, post 1012: "CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START]."
Was eventually answered in post 1113 when an anon made the connection to Syria false flag. Q responded, "Finally. Chemicals. Learn our comms."
I get it, but previous comms could still be used as a nod to anons that the plan is still in full effect and hold the line, by using them as future deltas as well.
Or as I said someone fucking with us.
It's a pretty damn strong plausibly deniable coincidence IMO.