What has been your favorite rabbit hole to explore since you’ve awoken? Looking for ideas and also genuinely curious!
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
I’m genuinely curious what interesting rabbit holes have been explored by other anons and which ones still keep you going back for more.
There is a whole lot of evidence that the 6M jews story was pushed by Rothschild agents to get the world to sympathize with "the persecuted" (that were ultimately killed by Rothschild et al) and get Israel. However, the evidence also suggests that about 300,000 Jews were killed ,and there were some seriously fucked up crimes committed by the Nazi's under Hitler's direction. That doesn't mean I think he was in charge, but I think he was complicit.
Painting him in a "good light" is not supported by the evidence I have seen. But I also don't think he was the guy we should really be hating. There were much worse than him in WWII.
The 6M number was being used long before WW2. It is a significant number in the Talmud, tied to one of their prophecies.
Which begs the question, do prophecies come true because certain events happen, or because people MAKE certain events happen.
Either way the 6M from WW2 is a myth and easily debunked in my opinion
"Debunked" is the wrong word to use. There is no such thing as "debunked." The concept of debunked is that the truth or falseness of a thing can be contained in a single rebuttal. The debate always continues. New evidence is always allowed.
Regardless of that protest, I agree there is substantial evidence against the claim that "6M Jews were killed by the Nazi's in in concentration camps during the 'holocaust'". All evidence I have seen in support of that claim has clear conflicts of interest. All rebuttals against that claim have substantial corroboration according to my research.
Did you understand the context in which I used the word?
It appears to me you use the word to state that a certain thing can be proven not true by a rebuttal. Did you mean it in some other way? Because reading your words again, that is what I see.
I would suggest that neither you, nor I, nor anyone really knows the Truth (AKA the Whole Truth) about this subject. The best we can reasonably determine (determine with the process of reason) is whether or not the evidence supports the assertion, and whether any doubts we have are reasonable (i.e. based on the process of reason, not fear, or desire, etc.). In other words, we can make the claim for ourselves using our critical thinking that a thing is beyond a reasonable doubt, but the word "debunked" suggests "truth" in some meaningful way, and all it requires to "debunk" something is to create a single convincing rebuttal against it. That is what the word means.
That word goes against all meaningful attempts to get at the truth of a thing. Debate never ends in that search. You can't debunk a thing, not ever, because the very word itself is a fraud designed to lead us down a path of believing whatever narrative someone convincing can give us that aligns with our particular biases.