Mob justice has been wrong many times in the past, and there is a reason why we have learned that such capital punishment requires proof beyond a shadow of a doubt.
People have been executed or died in prison for raping or murdering someone before the advent of DNA testing, and were later found innocent..after their lives had already ended.
The person above suggested that it doesn't matter if he's innocent, it's "worth the risk", because to him even being accused of abusing children is enough to be murdered.
It is not thinking rationally, logically or morally.
It is different if it's, say, a dad who caught the act on person and kills the guy over it.
But execution by the people is supposed to come with proof that they were guilty of it. You can not just accuse someone of something and then kill them for it.
Additionally, and from another important point of view, by murdering someone who is innocent based on accusation alone, you are potentially depriving the victim of their justice. You are potentially allowing the person who actually committed the crime to walk free. That is also immoral.
Maybe you should do something to fix the legal system so that the right guy gets caught and then charged and then convicted if hes found guilty. How would you like to go to one of these parts of the world on a vacation and then somebody just randomly accuses you of stealing frof stealing from them and you didn't even do shit you're just walking through the fucking street and then suddenly a whole fucking crowd of people is beating you to death with like 2 by force and shit?
Those people don't just accuse people of crimes. They have a pretty good idea of what's going on, and usually have a confession , same thing they do to highwaymen and thieves. Pretty much gotta get caught red handed . You live in some kind of alternate reality. Have a good one.btw you spell like a collage grad🤣
Maybe you shouldn't attack someone else when you have so many errors in your post. He spelled every word correctly except "from", which he typed as "frof".
Also, using your idiocy means that MeToo was the right way to handle things; innocent people's lives destroyed at the simple accusation, and no recompense for it, their lives forever tarnished.
I guess Kavanaugh should have been imprisoned immediately upon accusations.
Trump should have been destroyed on the lies that they spread about him too.
No? Of course not. Because accusations do not equate to reality, and our entire foundation of justice is based upon the words "innocent until proven guilty". Everyone has a right to a trial.
One innocent person being held to account for the sins of another is incredibly retarded and I will call you out for suggesting that this is "worth the risk".
You cannot kill hundreds to stop one person, maybe.
Your morality is trash then, and killing an innocent person will send you straight to hell and remove any virtuousness you believe you have.
How do you know he's innocent???
I didn't say he's innocent. Learn to read.
Mob justice has been wrong many times in the past, and there is a reason why we have learned that such capital punishment requires proof beyond a shadow of a doubt.
People have been executed or died in prison for raping or murdering someone before the advent of DNA testing, and were later found innocent..after their lives had already ended.
The person above suggested that it doesn't matter if he's innocent, it's "worth the risk", because to him even being accused of abusing children is enough to be murdered.
It is not thinking rationally, logically or morally.
It is different if it's, say, a dad who caught the act on person and kills the guy over it.
But execution by the people is supposed to come with proof that they were guilty of it. You can not just accuse someone of something and then kill them for it.
Additionally, and from another important point of view, by murdering someone who is innocent based on accusation alone, you are potentially depriving the victim of their justice. You are potentially allowing the person who actually committed the crime to walk free. That is also immoral.
Maybe you should do something to fix the legal system so that the right guy gets caught and then charged and then convicted if hes found guilty. How would you like to go to one of these parts of the world on a vacation and then somebody just randomly accuses you of stealing frof stealing from them and you didn't even do shit you're just walking through the fucking street and then suddenly a whole fucking crowd of people is beating you to death with like 2 by force and shit?
Those people don't just accuse people of crimes. They have a pretty good idea of what's going on, and usually have a confession , same thing they do to highwaymen and thieves. Pretty much gotta get caught red handed . You live in some kind of alternate reality. Have a good one.btw you spell like a collage grad🤣
kek "collage"
Maybe you shouldn't attack someone else when you have so many errors in your post. He spelled every word correctly except "from", which he typed as "frof".
Also, using your idiocy means that MeToo was the right way to handle things; innocent people's lives destroyed at the simple accusation, and no recompense for it, their lives forever tarnished.
I guess Kavanaugh should have been imprisoned immediately upon accusations.
Trump should have been destroyed on the lies that they spread about him too.
No? Of course not. Because accusations do not equate to reality, and our entire foundation of justice is based upon the words "innocent until proven guilty". Everyone has a right to a trial.
One innocent person being held to account for the sins of another is incredibly retarded and I will call you out for suggesting that this is "worth the risk".
You cannot kill hundreds to stop one person, maybe.
See, now you're retarded.
Someone isn't a pedophile just because you call them a pedophile.
If you kill one single innocent person, you deserve to be gunned down like filth.
Your self righteousness shows, let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
please reread what you just posted and explain the context to me. from your previous comments, I dont think you get what you are saying here.
u/09re:
You're not without sin if you kill an innocent person. It's not self righteousness; murdering an innocent person is a cardinal sin. Period.