It really does seem to be a pattern that the boosters do the most damage.
It seriously seems to follow a pattern that it tends to be the booster who are receiving the worst and deadliest effects, even outside the kill boxes.
Honestly you would think that we would have figured out how to cure blood clots more effectively, especially with the obesity rates in the world. Lots of test subjects for new technologies.
Almost like big pharma doesn't want to cure anyone, just treat them.
Blood is pretty well understood by this point though. We can thicken it, thin it, and we can clear up certain blood clots pretty easily. It's just weird that we don't seem to focus on improving our technologies.
Treatments for a lot of issues seem to have stagnated significantly over the last 20 years. All the promising treatments never seem to reach market, for any disease or illness.
In particular, it's weird that we can't seem to resolve a blood clot in the lungs. Or at least, not so simply.
Dunno, just seems to me that government and pharmaceutical companies work hand in hand to stop cures before they are further developed.
Always seems like there's another new miracle cure for most types of cancers but then we almost never seem to move forward from chemo.
There's a difference from lot to lot. Ingredients don't have to remain the same, and they can be in varying amounts. This is why some lots seem to be significantly more deadly than others.
It really does seem to be a pattern that the boosters do the most damage.
It seriously seems to follow a pattern that it tends to be the booster who are receiving the worst and deadliest effects, even outside the kill boxes.
Honestly you would think that we would have figured out how to cure blood clots more effectively, especially with the obesity rates in the world. Lots of test subjects for new technologies.
Almost like big pharma doesn't want to cure anyone, just treat them.
Blood is pretty well understood by this point though. We can thicken it, thin it, and we can clear up certain blood clots pretty easily. It's just weird that we don't seem to focus on improving our technologies.
Treatments for a lot of issues seem to have stagnated significantly over the last 20 years. All the promising treatments never seem to reach market, for any disease or illness.
In particular, it's weird that we can't seem to resolve a blood clot in the lungs. Or at least, not so simply.
Dunno, just seems to me that government and pharmaceutical companies work hand in hand to stop cures before they are further developed.
Always seems like there's another new miracle cure for most types of cancers but then we almost never seem to move forward from chemo.
Is there a difference in the shot and booster? I thought it was just the 3rd one. Build up as it were.
There's a difference from lot to lot. Ingredients don't have to remain the same, and they can be in varying amounts. This is why some lots seem to be significantly more deadly than others.
Ahhh. Bad quality control.
I had heard of some extremely deadly batches that rather than pull them they mixed them into other batches, sent them nation wide, to hide the death.