List of Transfers of Power-these look so suspicious. Why is the date and time so precise? Bad guys appear to be up to something. The 7-14-85 transfer to Bush was clearly weaponized to seize power. But were these transfers to Cheney (George HW Bush's close #2 buddy) also weaponized to give Cheney full control? https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/list-vice-presidents-who-served-acting-president-under-the-25th-amendment
6-29-02 Bush Jr. to Cheney transfer: https://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/06/29/bush.tests/index.html
7-21-07 Bush Jr. to Cheney transfer: https://www.smh.com.au/world/bush-transfers-power-to-cheney-briefly-20070721-ozq.html
Cheney wrote a letter to his kids as "President". What else did he do? https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney_Letter_2007-07-21
Lots of "Fact Checking" around this topic make is very suspicious, but it needs more digging.
Agreed. This is the logic. If one cannot publicly be President, then control whoever is by some means not yet figured out. It looks like some sort of "higher than POTUS" position. Maybe some sort of Chairman of the Corporation? Haven't figured it out yet.
I think the Vice President is some sort of chairman of the corporation. It has been established that the United States has been a corporation since 1871. You need a chairman and a President like most corporations.
Now this is interesting. I was assuming VP was a cabal “safety”. I had never considered that VP = Corp Chairman, so Corporate President would actually work for the VP, effectively; and could “step down” into President role as needed, legally, per corporate bylaws.
Here is the structure for other countries:
Countries with a Prime Minister: The Deputy Prime Minister is the Corp Chairman Italy: The President is the Corp Chairman The Vatican: For our purposes we are calling it a country. The Secretary of State is the Corp Chairman. Plus the Vatican is the only "country" the elects its leader via the board of directors.