In a previous post I highlighted the fact that 04/10/2018 contains the numerical equivalent of DJT (Donald John Trump). Some anons questioned whether this is a valid way to read the post. I want to answer them and lay out my case for why it is not only valid, but what Q wanted.
Stay with me, anons. I will make my case.
First, look at Q post #40.
4, 10, 20
a, b, c, d, e…
Q specifically pointed out the numerical combination of DJT. It was clear “WATCH FOR THIS”. It is a comm in and of itself.
(Assume “04” since the zero will often be a placeholder.)
Certain numerical combinations are special. Think “143” and “666”.
What are the odds of getting those 3 digits at random?
There is a lot of math that can go into probability. (check it out here.) https://owlcation.com/stem/How-to-Work-Out-Odds-Permutations-and-Combinations
What are the odds of randomly getting the six digits that make “DJT”?
04/10/20
Not high.
Now look at Q post #3671 where talks about how BILL BARR can fit into 8 spaces.
Do you know what else can fit into 8 spaces? A date.
08/08/2022
Every Q post has a date and a timestamp.
Each date has 8 slots. Each timestamp has 6. 14 possible numerical combinations.
The date slot has more restrictions on its numbers than the timestamp slot.
(aka a month can only be between 01 to 12.)
What are the odds that 6 of the 8 slots for the date will make DJT?
Answer: extremely limited.
Search under “Apr 10” to see how many posts.
Answer: 16 posts
04/10/2018 => 8 posts
04/10/2019 => 1 post
04/10/2020 => 7 posts
Total: 16 posts
Look at Q post #1121
Actions today [raid] will be met w/ swift action.
FBI burning midnight oil.
It is the 5th post made on the April 10th date. 4 posts proceed it. (4 => 5)
The first post on April 10th by Q is post #1117
17 = Q
Do you think that’s just coincidence? That Q wasn’t aware?
Did you know that between 04/10/2018 and 08/08/2022 (day the FBI raided Trump’s home) there are 4 year, 3 months, and 3 days? (226 weeks).
8 + 8 = 16.
16 posts on April 10th.
8 posts on April 10th, 2018.
Q can’t make 88 from the year slot so instead Q made 8 posts on that date to get 8/8.
Shills push the claim that Q is just vague enough to get things “right” by sheer luck, They push that it’s just the equivalent of a horoscope and that anons are just seeing what they want to see.
(From the same people that push that a well-ordered universe was created by a giant explosion, because setting off a bomb will “sometimes” result in a well-built house. People spend years using crazy maths and imaginary numbers to try and prove this mathematically, but always end up scratching their heads when it never quite works out. Trust the ScIEnCE, people!)
Q argued that mathematical improbability of elements of its post proved its legitimacy (aka deltas, word choices, ect.)
So for Q to get “lucky” as shills push, we have to remember that (as of now) there are only 4958 posts for Q to get “lucky” with.
(sidenote: Q went from 4953 posts to 4958 at the end of June. 3 posts were added on 6/24/2022 which brought the total # of posts on June 24th to 17 posts. 2 post was added on 6/25/2022 to bring the total posts on that date to 8. And 1 post was added on 6/29/2022 to bring its total to 11 posts on June 29th.
It makes 3…2…1
Check it out here.)
How many times could nail a prediction and blame it on “chance” before it becomes absurd?
1/4958 to get one detail right.
1/4958 to get two details right.
1/4958 to get three details right.
The more details are correctly predicted in a single post the lower the chance of random and the higher the odds of coordination.
For the sake of argument, let’s examine Q post # 1121 again.
(One of the most perfectly nailed predictions in my opinion).
Here is what happened (highlighted are terms correctly predicted in Q post #1121):
The FBI raided DJT’s home on 08/082022 at 9 am and took 12 boxes.
(21 is the mirror of 12. Post #1121).
The FBI agents left the property around 6:30 p.m.[33] with about 12 additional boxes.
(Additional meaning added to what was taken in the original NARA raid months ago.)
Text Trump is 88022.
Raid happened on 8/8/2022.
Wray (which Q said “TRUST WRAY” in Q post #1120 on 04/10/2018 and was the 4th post) had a strange conversation with Grassley on 8/4/2022.
See here.
Grassley kept asking Wray for 21 more minutes (12 is the mirror and 12 boxes were taken from Trump’s home). Also Q post 1121.
(8 + 4 = 12)
And if that is not enough, read this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_search_of_Mar-a-Lago
On August 8, 2022, at 9 a.m.,[1] FBI agents executed a search warrant approved by a federal magistrate judge[15] and searched Trump's residence at Mar-a-Lago. The Secret Service facilitated access for the FBI, and two of Trump's lawyers, Christina Bobb and Lindsey Halligan, were present for the search,[10] though not allowed inside.[16] The warrant had been obtained by the United States Department of Justice National Security Division at the request of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to – according to the Trump attorney – collect "presidential records or classified material" that Trump had potentially not turned over to NARA.
Peter Schorsch, the publisher of FloridaPolitics.com, was the first to report on the search.[22][14] In a tweet, Schorsch wrote that the FBI had "executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago", although he was unsure of why the search was being conducted.
Peter Schorsch was the first to break the story via twitter.
That same day Trump was stumping for Sarah Palin.
P.S. is a way to say “Special message” or “PS”.
What a coincidence!
Here is another one:
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-could-disqualified-holding-office-090335881.html
Marc Elias, a leading Democratic elections lawyer who served as general counsel for Hilary Clinton’s campaign, noted in a tweet that the FBI raid would potentially turn out to be a “blockbuster in American politics”.
He referred to Section 2071 of Title 18 of the United States Code which makes it illegal if someone with custody of confidential government records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.
Oh there is the 18 again.
If you buy that these are just the work of “sheer” random and Q “getting lucky”, then I have some property in Wakanda to sell you.
This was my logic for my previous posts and why I think my argument was valid.
Because that was part of the initial point I was making until I made my case. That is why I said to stay with me until the end. Reading one word without looking at the whole and the final conclusion is doing yourself a disservice.
It's no different than the very ones who got hung up on over the 18 at the end of 04/10/20(18). People miss the forest because they focus on a twig they didn't like.
What was my conclusion? That was the point.
What you are saying is you just didn't how I worded one sentence. What did you think of the overall post?
I often am distracted by irritating twigs.
Yup. Twigs are fun. They go crunch crunch when you step on them. You should see my niece with them.
Using prediction as part of your post in regards to describing Q, loses credibility. It should never be used as it is not what Q is. That is your flaw and was all I was referencing.
As to your post in general, it was very detailed and a lot of thought was put into it. It is quite a stretcher in some places though. Sometimes the simple things are the most logical.
"It should never be used as it is not what Q is. That is your flaw and was all I was referencing."
I think that is dead wrong. First most anons say "Q predicted" and at the end of the day they can give their opinion and say it however they want. I don't think anyone should run around trying to police their words or say "YOU SAID A WORD I DON'T LIKE!"
Highly recommend you don't police language "Stop saying predicted!". It's just silly to police language like that. And it's not a flaw. It's 'your opinion". Don't use your opinion as a fact and then try to police others with it. It distracts and wastes energy on a useless thing.
Are you really running around to every anon who said "Q predicted" and trying to push your opinion "It's planned". I agree its planned and coordinated, but some anons see it differently. They may be right too. There is a lot of interpretation in the word prediction and how we use it in the context of Q.
Don't run around police anon's language. It's silly.
"It is quite a stretcher in some places though."
And where did you consider it the stretcher?
You were so hyper-focused on one word you hate and (I guess you run around policing anons on that word) but then you suddenly want to be vague and opaque on what part you actually didn't agree with.
Ok, what are the exact parts points you didn't agree with. Let's see if I can pick apart each one.
LOL, no.
So then what was your entire point? You went to great lengths to complain about the word "predicted" and (it appears I'm not the only anon whose language you've tried to police).
You hyper focused on a word for no reason.
Then you make this claim:
"It is quite a stretcher in some places though"
But won't give a single detail on what you thought was a stretch. What did you think was a stretch? I can easily point out why you're wrong Tell me if you're going to make that claim.
Are you nervous or something?