Here's another take on that warrant. This fellow posits that the Never Trumpers may be in some big trouble.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Interesting. A couple of really big assumptions though:
Assuming that Wray is to be trusted, and is still on the team, despite tremendous evidence of corruption indicating the contrary, including his own sworn statements to Congress.
Assuming Trump is a DoJ asset. The DoJ has been hostile to him since he announced for the Presidency in 2015. The DoJ has gone to war with him, even bugging the White House under fraudulent pretexts from the Hillary "big lie." That's not just a little hostile. It's the most openly hostile the DoJ has been to any elected official in our history.
Assuming the target is Never Trumper Republicans. Even if we were to assume the first two, the natural target would be the DoJ itself. That is, the idea would be that Trump knew their plan and decided to sting the stinger with poison pill data.
If we were to evaluate this, we'd need at least some sort of rationale or logic to suggest any of it is valid.
Yes, Trump used the 33 code, invoking the Deep State in his first response referencing Obama's "33 million documents." And Q341 refers to the specific assertion that Obama classified evidence of crimes and keeps it at his Presidential Library. I'm actually not sure if the building's complete. It only started construction Sept 2021, long after Q341 was written, and I've seen nothing to suggest the building is complete, or that the public has access to any of these documents. This is a very long delay for a presidential library.
Yes, Bezos panicked and had his Washington Compost post a story suggesting Trump had "nuclear secrets." For those unaware, the word "nuclear" is often used as a reference to highly explosive secrets with great destructive potential to the current political order. While the assertion was widely mocked in the media, that too, was part of spreading the message to the ears who needed to hear it. Something important was seized and it was a threat to the Deep State boys.
So, we know something's up here. But we have nothing to point at NeverTrumpers other than that they've been shockingly quiet about the whole thing, but that's because they're biding their time and hoping something legit comes out of this and they can jump on it to finish Trump off. Again, nothing I know of specifically implicates them.
As always, I'm open to new information, but with what I have, the assumptions are too bold and there's insufficient evidence.
Nice analysis. I also wondered why this meangeneon person was pointing specifically at the Never Trumpers/RINOs/America Last subgroup (I lump them all together, whatever you want to call them). All I can think of is that, for the period in question between the election and the Potatus's fake inauguration, perhaps POTUS was meeting with many NT lawmakers to try and persuade them to do the right thing.
That said, I thought the warrant covered POTUS's entire first term so perhaps this singling-out of just the NTers is to keep the normies engaged and interested in staying on top of this unfolding drama. If he/she had included crimes by the communists, bad tech would have censored his/her tweet/post/whatever source these comments came from. We know fake news won't touch the topics of leftist corruption and crimes, but the tech algorithms wouldn't screen out a message like this because it appears to target only the right. The sheeple will continue to watch this story unfold because they've been trained to reject any incriminating information about the left as "partisan", but rabidly take in anything pointing at criminals on the right. Just a theory.
This is an excellent response. A question: what was the 33 code referencing when Trump mentioned 33 mil docs?
33 degree masons?
I agree with your conclusion of this makes too many assumptions and lacks evidence, but I think the most glaring issue other than all the assumptions is what on earth is the motive to do something like this? If the theory is that Trump possessed evidence upon leaving, and they needed to raid his home in order to legally use said evidence to take action against someone who isn't Trump, and mind you this action is favorable to Trump... why do they need to do this? If the evidence was obtained illegally, does doing this somehow magically turn it into legally obtained evidence? Not as far as I know, otherwise why would the government need something like the Patriot act? They could just hand over illegally obtained evidence to anyone, raid them, boom its legal, so obviously this isn't the case. And if it was obtained legally, why bother with this? You already have legally obtained evidence of crimes committed by someone, why on earth do you need to give that evidence to someone else and then raid that person's home just to get the evidence again? Not even taking into account the assumptions made it already doesn't make sense as theory.
It appears they're going after POTUS, right? It appears the DOJ and FBI are all gunning to get the bad orange man and lock him up. The fake news media has been putting this message out for months, that Trump needs to be locked up. Pedowood personalities are chiming in with the message in unison. Now the sheep who are brainwashed by leftist programming are very excited by this latest development. They have not a clue that the marxist DS wants to eliminate bad orange man from being eligible to run for election in 2024 and even needs desperately to stain republicans before the midterms. The marxist trash are about to lose control so they're spinning this as a gotcha moment. Remember when they were all caterwauling about Rittenhouse being a white supremacist? The sheeple were watching the trial with smug enthusiasm. I have a rabid lefty friend who was, refused to believe it when I'd told him beforehand what was going on. After the trial? Crickets. . .
Now that the white hats have the sheeple's attention the sheep will be keeping abreast of what happens as a result of the raid. It's not just RINOs featured in those documents. If the white hats had released that info way back when, when POTUS was visibly and publicly in the driver's seat, the fake news would have just cried witch-hunt, saying they were made-up false stories about the left DS players, the usual. Even right after POTUS moved to the background they'd still cry partisan attack, etc. Now, with over a year and a half of Potatus appearing as (p)resident and this looking like a strong arm tactic to squash the bad orange man, all eyes are on those documents. We know that POTUS is calling for the documents to be released to the public, claims they were declassified so this will end up in court (imho). The sheeple think he's trying to hide something.
Sheep will be watching. Patriots will be watching. Fence-sitters will be watching. There are documents that have been declassified and they are now evidence. How do you introduce evidence legally? Let all the people know there are incriminating documents and each thinks it's against the opposing side. They have to be shown. They have to look for themselves. Manufactured desirability.
Optics.
Just a reminder, Q specifically told us to trust Wray 3 separate times.
https://qalerts.app/?q=Trust+wray
Yes, Q also said that disinformation is necessary, but I feel like in cases where something is said multiple times, this doesn’t apply (but who knows).