So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
The Navy has nuclear submarines. There are no rogue submarines. It is still unclear what happened at Ketron Island. It could have been an SLBM launch, but that requires two independent launch authorizations according to the code for that missile. Lately, the submarines have been put under Permission Active Link (PAL) control, so fully independent launch should be physically impossible.
The Ketron island event revealed a possible rogue submarine, the USS Richard Russell (coincidentally, the same name as the guy who, if you can believe it, stole a 787 and did a barrel loop in it before crashing it into Ketron island).
SSN-687. Decommissioned in 1994, more than 20 years ago. Not even a ballistic missile submarine. There are no rogue submarines, because they would require a rogue base of operations, rogue Blue and Gold crews, rogue supplies and maintenance, including rogue nuclear reactor refueling. Can you see where this is all leading? To Fantasy Island. Where there are lots of people named "Richard Russell" (just ask Google). This is so lame, it could be a millipede.
North Korea is the presumed sub base in this theory. North Korea appears propped up by the swiss banks. Perhaps retrofitted with missile capabilities, maybe launched from Ketron island, as there’s spoopy ass shit going on there too.
Recall, in Q 1845 and 1846, that Q highlighted the kind of aircraft (Q400, not 787, my bad) that Richard Russell stole and crashed into Ketron island. The sub in question, the Richard B Russell, was allegedly decommissioned in Puget Sound right where the missile event took place. The story of doing a barrel roll is unbelievable in the extreme, he was no pilot and that plane isn’t made for such maneuvers. And then the news tried to pass the missile off as a helicopter.
I dunno man, I’m not convinced it’s nothing.
North Korea would be a sub base in a fantasy. Do you have any idea what Puget Sound is, particularly near Ketron Island? That is right off the city of Tacoma, and any missile launch would have been witnessed by about 200,000 people. It is also deep in the south of the Sound. Our Trident submarines are based at Naval Base Kitsap (encompassing the former NB Bangor in Hood Canal). Do you think that the Navy would allow unidentified submarines to gain entrance to the Sound? We do have underwater means of detection, you know. The whole idea is loopy.
The sub was decommissioned. The Navy is rather a stickler about what happens to nuclear subs meant for elimination. All this stuff about a person named Richard Russell is a meaningless coincidence. There are plenty of people named Richard Russell in a country of 330 million. Not that I am much of a believer in any Richard Russell mythology, there is nothing particularly amazing about doing a barrel roll in a 787. Tex Johnston did that in a 707 in 1955 over Lake Washington. The airplanes are designed to keep together in adverse conditions and inverted flight is one of them. (At least one 727 was reported to have gone supersonic in an unplanned emergency dive. The wings were permanently deformed by the experience, and the airplane was taken out of service.)
The helicopter explanation is semi-credible. It would create a light streak having the same general size and shape (supposedly). I was only part way through an analysis of that photo when I had to break off, and never returned to it. My impression was that the explanation didn't entirely hold together. It has the advantage that nobody would have seen it other than that camera.