So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
North Korea is the presumed sub base in this theory. North Korea appears propped up by the swiss banks. Perhaps retrofitted with missile capabilities, maybe launched from Ketron island, as there’s spoopy ass shit going on there too.
Recall, in Q 1845 and 1846, that Q highlighted the kind of aircraft (Q400, not 787, my bad) that Richard Russell stole and crashed into Ketron island. The sub in question, the Richard B Russell, was allegedly decommissioned in Puget Sound right where the missile event took place. The story of doing a barrel roll is unbelievable in the extreme, he was no pilot and that plane isn’t made for such maneuvers. And then the news tried to pass the missile off as a helicopter.
I dunno man, I’m not convinced it’s nothing.
North Korea would be a sub base in a fantasy. Do you have any idea what Puget Sound is, particularly near Ketron Island? That is right off the city of Tacoma, and any missile launch would have been witnessed by about 200,000 people. It is also deep in the south of the Sound. Our Trident submarines are based at Naval Base Kitsap (encompassing the former NB Bangor in Hood Canal). Do you think that the Navy would allow unidentified submarines to gain entrance to the Sound? We do have underwater means of detection, you know. The whole idea is loopy.
The sub was decommissioned. The Navy is rather a stickler about what happens to nuclear subs meant for elimination. All this stuff about a person named Richard Russell is a meaningless coincidence. There are plenty of people named Richard Russell in a country of 330 million. Not that I am much of a believer in any Richard Russell mythology, there is nothing particularly amazing about doing a barrel roll in a 787. Tex Johnston did that in a 707 in 1955 over Lake Washington. The airplanes are designed to keep together in adverse conditions and inverted flight is one of them. (At least one 727 was reported to have gone supersonic in an unplanned emergency dive. The wings were permanently deformed by the experience, and the airplane was taken out of service.)
The helicopter explanation is semi-credible. It would create a light streak having the same general size and shape (supposedly). I was only part way through an analysis of that photo when I had to break off, and never returned to it. My impression was that the explanation didn't entirely hold together. It has the advantage that nobody would have seen it other than that camera.
Yes, Puget Sound is a major underwater base like Sanya. Implies navy consent for this treason, or implies the sub was upgraded (the former is more likely to me).
It was witnessed, and caught on camera even.
The Richard Russell coincidence is astonishing. As is the story of a Q400 being stolen by someone who never flew before and barrel-rolled. If the navy were in on it, they’d have participated in allowing the sub to be “decommissioned” but not destroyed. Perhaps a sub theory of this theory is that a cabal within the navy allowed it.
The helicopter explanation is non credible. See the photo for yourself.
You might scoff at the treason required but… we’ve seen plenty of treason already. Why is “more treason” so hard to believe?
The only thing that is "likely" is that the sub was decommissioned and ceased to exist in 1994, 28 years ago. This is a conclusive fact. Anything else is just complete fantasy. You don't tuck a submarine into a pocket and walk away with it. The decommissioning process is a dry dock deconstruction of the sub, to remove equipment for salvage, take the reactor apart and put its remains someplace safe, and scrap the hull. This is a huge, industrial-scale process and it can't be hidden. It's omission most definitely can't be hidden. The removed equipment is definitely inventoried. You have no grounds for imagining otherwise.
That and the fact, as I mentioned, that we have means to detect and deal with "rogue" submarines. This could not be operating out of Bangor (non-rogue naval base) and Ketron Island is far from Hood Canal as the porpoise swims. You are laboring on one piece of the fantasy, when the fantasy taken as a whole simply cannot exist.
Bangor is not even remotely like Sanya; it is open to view. I've been inside one of the Trident subs and seen it for myself.
Give it up. I'm not thrilled by the helicopter explanation; as I said, I have analyzed the photo and it is borderline. But the elimination of explanation A (helicopter) does not mean proof of explanation B (fantasy submarine). It just means there is an explanation C (unknown at this point). I am beginning to think that this whole thing was one of Q's "disinformations." A plenitude of treason does not overcome the factual and operational impossibilities of the fantasy scenario. It's not true that an excess of treason is able to materialize a fantasy submarine. That is not even a rational connection.
I’m completely dissatisfied with the helicopter explanation and cannot accept it. The fact that they lied about it says there’s something to hide.
What are they hiding about the ketron island apparent missile? Why the insane coincidence surrounding Richard B Russell? What’s up with Ketron Island itself, Bill Gates one of like 12 people who owns land there.
You may be getting sleepy but I am not.