So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
The only thing that is "likely" is that the sub was decommissioned and ceased to exist in 1994, 28 years ago. This is a conclusive fact. Anything else is just complete fantasy. You don't tuck a submarine into a pocket and walk away with it. The decommissioning process is a dry dock deconstruction of the sub, to remove equipment for salvage, take the reactor apart and put its remains someplace safe, and scrap the hull. This is a huge, industrial-scale process and it can't be hidden. It's omission most definitely can't be hidden. The removed equipment is definitely inventoried. You have no grounds for imagining otherwise.
That and the fact, as I mentioned, that we have means to detect and deal with "rogue" submarines. This could not be operating out of Bangor (non-rogue naval base) and Ketron Island is far from Hood Canal as the porpoise swims. You are laboring on one piece of the fantasy, when the fantasy taken as a whole simply cannot exist.
Bangor is not even remotely like Sanya; it is open to view. I've been inside one of the Trident subs and seen it for myself.
Give it up. I'm not thrilled by the helicopter explanation; as I said, I have analyzed the photo and it is borderline. But the elimination of explanation A (helicopter) does not mean proof of explanation B (fantasy submarine). It just means there is an explanation C (unknown at this point). I am beginning to think that this whole thing was one of Q's "disinformations." A plenitude of treason does not overcome the factual and operational impossibilities of the fantasy scenario. It's not true that an excess of treason is able to materialize a fantasy submarine. That is not even a rational connection.
I’m completely dissatisfied with the helicopter explanation and cannot accept it. The fact that they lied about it says there’s something to hide.
What are they hiding about the ketron island apparent missile? Why the insane coincidence surrounding Richard B Russell? What’s up with Ketron Island itself, Bill Gates one of like 12 people who owns land there.
You may be getting sleepy but I am not.
Have you analyzed the photo? I have. I'm not thrilled with the copter explanation but there is no way to prove it is a lie. There is no "fact" that they lied, so you have to let it rest as an open question. There being no "fact," there is no basis of imagining something is being hidden.
What is there to hide about Ketron Island? It is one of the most obvious features of the local landscape, in view of any approaching or departing airliner on a track south of Seattle-Tacoma International airport...not to mention any small private aircraft.
What coincidence? 1) We don't know what really happened. 2) No rogue submarine was involved. 3) There are plenty of Richard Russells and there is no coincidence if there was no submarine.
To the contrary, I've been the one here who is keeping alert to what is real and what is wishful thinking.
I've got all the contemporaneous 8ch breads saved offline, and I've gone back over them. Anons pulled those pictures apart every which way, looked at similar other pictures and helicopters flying by on the same exact feed, there's simply no way it was a helicopter. At this point, the ball's on their side... prove it really was a helicopter.
Anons also dug into the island (which I've been and found it difficult to access, to have very few residents of whom Bill Gates is one, and there was some evidence of some kind of mkultra type school having been there once. Presumably whatever is hidden there is underground, since it's obviously easily seen from the air. The Q400 was followed by a military fighter jet, and the pics of the crash was weird, the plane was nowhere to be seen.
As for the coincidence, I've laid out what I see. The only other thing to add is Q post 1479, in which he posts an image of the very sub and invites us to do a reverse image search (in which we learn the sub's designation). This post was right after the Q400 crash. Why would Q highlight this?
The "sleepy" ref is chan talk, shills always show up and claim they see nothing and what's more, they're tired and isn't everyone else? Half joshing you, but it's surprising that you don't see loose threads all over this event. Theorizing is how we come to the truth, so what's your theory?
Since I am a scientist and engineer, I realize when there is no theory and just set the problem aside for the time being. Q also mentioned that there would be disinformation. (Too many scientists are psychologically intolerant of open questions and force everything into a theory, even if the force-fit is a bad fit. Astrophysics is in that condition.)
Asking questions ("Why would Q post an image of that sub?") does not imply any answers, much less a specific answer. If it was the SS Russell, it would have been 28 years dead and gone. So that is out of the question---even if it was capable of firing missiles, which it wasn't. I've been to two submarine bases and inside two nuclear submarines. I've taken the Navy course for industry on anti-submarine warfare. There is no way such constructions would slip out of custody, and nowhere they could be taken. There is no way a non-Navy submarine would be permitted to enter Puget Sound.
The only scenario that remotely makes sense would be if it was an SLBM launch from Hood Canal (Bangor?), not near Ketron Island. Vastly smaller population of possible witnesses. Conspiracy level down to just two people acting in concert. But still a hard sell.