So just a few short weeks ago there was talk and and panic about New York prepping for a nuclear fallout type of incident. Now with the narrative that President Trump had the nuclear codes or whatever, one must ponder the possibility that they are getting ready for their false flag event involving nuclear weapons...
I really hope I am over thinking this...
Which proves what? There is nothing remarkable about those clips. Of course the airplane would "sink" into the side of the building. What else could it do? Are the building walls going to go anywhere? It is interesting to see that the engines were stripped off and left at the face of the building, which is consistent with the fact that they had a lot of frontal area and not as much sectional density as the rest of the airplane.
The "raw video" and "newscast" images were not taken from the same line of sight. The airplane may have been out of image for the "raw video" clip, or too faint to be resolved. What deception? All you have is a desire to see something you think cannot be true, or cannot be explained.
Airplanes don't sink into a steel reinforced building. They usually splatter then fall down
Says the man who doesn't know what he is talking about. This happened before in 1945 when a B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/the-b-25-empire-state-building-crash-tragedy-on-34th-street/ There is no "usually." When you have 179 tons of airliner hitting a building at 465 mph, the building will give way.