I also have been noticing a lot clearer skies in CA recently. It really feels like something has changed. Not just a lack of chemtrails, but clear skies, like I don't remember ever seeing here (over the past dozen years or so).
First, and perhaps most important, the evidence does not support an increase in global temperature rise. On the contrary, the evidence suggests the average global temperature has been decreasing over the past 6 years.
In order to understand the temperature data, you must dig into the temperature data.
The reports and graphs that NASA prints is literally a lie. Their graphs do not match their data when you dig into the data. They match for some years, but not for others. For those others, their aggregate report data is different than when performing the analysis yourself. In other words, if I perform an averaging analysis on the data (a relatively easy computation), on earlier years I get what they printed (I have not done it for all years, just a couple), but for the past 6 years, I do not get what they show. It's not off by a lot, but its off by more than the error bars, and it errors "high" in every case. If you graph what is actually output by the data, you get a clear decreasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years.
In other words, their graph shows a mild increasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years. The data itself shows a mild decreasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years. The difference is not huge, but these trends are outside of the error bars, so it can't be attributed to "whoopsie," it is undeniably fraud, just to keep the graph going up.
Any conclusions based on that evidence, such as in this video are not supported, because the evidence itself is fraudulent.
In addition, many of the arguments made in this video are very weak. The "alignment" of temperature "anomalies" with specific events at CERN completely ignore that the reporting of those events have nothing to do with the average energy output of the particle accelerators over some period of time. They really don't align very well at all anyways.
The correlation with heat waves and location of particle accelerators (if it's even true at all, I trust the NASA data as far as I can throw it) would not necessarily be indicative of a meaningful correlation. On the contrary, if there are contrived heat waves, they would be in well populated areas.
Using technologies like HAARP to cause heat waves would be done in such areas to align the beliefs of the largest portion of the population to the propaganda. Two of the areas signified as "heat waves" also correlate with some of the largest areas of propaganda pushing that narrative; i.e. China, and that particular area of Europe. I'm not sure about the other area (Egypt).
There are particle accelerators in America as well. Why aren't they on there? There are particle accelerators all over the place actually. Why aren't any of them on there? I mean, we hear about CERN, but there are plenty of others, even if they aren't as big and prominent. And that's just according to the official narrative.
This whole thing makes far too many suppositions. It also picks parts of the narrative as 'true" to prove it's point, while ignoring all the evidence against those parts of the narrative.
We don’t have record high heat right now. You’ll find the record highs in late 1920’s and early 30’s. Tony Heller has tons of videos about the recorded weather.
Heatwaves preceded by masses of chemtrails turning the sky white and trapping the heat. Lot easier and cheaper than CERN.
I also have been noticing a lot clearer skies in CA recently. It really feels like something has changed. Not just a lack of chemtrails, but clear skies, like I don't remember ever seeing here (over the past dozen years or so).
This video has several glaring flaws.
First, and perhaps most important, the evidence does not support an increase in global temperature rise. On the contrary, the evidence suggests the average global temperature has been decreasing over the past 6 years.
In order to understand the temperature data, you must dig into the temperature data.
The reports and graphs that NASA prints is literally a lie. Their graphs do not match their data when you dig into the data. They match for some years, but not for others. For those others, their aggregate report data is different than when performing the analysis yourself. In other words, if I perform an averaging analysis on the data (a relatively easy computation), on earlier years I get what they printed (I have not done it for all years, just a couple), but for the past 6 years, I do not get what they show. It's not off by a lot, but its off by more than the error bars, and it errors "high" in every case. If you graph what is actually output by the data, you get a clear decreasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years.
In other words, their graph shows a mild increasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years. The data itself shows a mild decreasing trend in global temperatures over the past 6 years. The difference is not huge, but these trends are outside of the error bars, so it can't be attributed to "whoopsie," it is undeniably fraud, just to keep the graph going up.
Any conclusions based on that evidence, such as in this video are not supported, because the evidence itself is fraudulent.
In addition, many of the arguments made in this video are very weak. The "alignment" of temperature "anomalies" with specific events at CERN completely ignore that the reporting of those events have nothing to do with the average energy output of the particle accelerators over some period of time. They really don't align very well at all anyways.
The correlation with heat waves and location of particle accelerators (if it's even true at all, I trust the NASA data as far as I can throw it) would not necessarily be indicative of a meaningful correlation. On the contrary, if there are contrived heat waves, they would be in well populated areas.
Using technologies like HAARP to cause heat waves would be done in such areas to align the beliefs of the largest portion of the population to the propaganda. Two of the areas signified as "heat waves" also correlate with some of the largest areas of propaganda pushing that narrative; i.e. China, and that particular area of Europe. I'm not sure about the other area (Egypt).
There are particle accelerators in America as well. Why aren't they on there? There are particle accelerators all over the place actually. Why aren't any of them on there? I mean, we hear about CERN, but there are plenty of others, even if they aren't as big and prominent. And that's just according to the official narrative.
This whole thing makes far too many suppositions. It also picks parts of the narrative as 'true" to prove it's point, while ignoring all the evidence against those parts of the narrative.
We don’t have record high heat right now. You’ll find the record highs in late 1920’s and early 30’s. Tony Heller has tons of videos about the recorded weather.
It has definitely been much hotter during spring and summer where I live between 10 and 30 years ago.
The model they are using an FE model.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/particle-physics-also-ukraine-invasion/