Congress has used its constitutional power to declare war five times in the nation’s history: the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, and World War II. Since World War II, the United States has never actually declared war, despite our being at near-constant war since the days of the Truman administration.
The WOII never ended as no peace treaty is in place with the German Reich. Even the unconditional surrender is not de jure, since it was signed by, if memory serves me well, Jodl, while the head of the State: Adm. Dönitz should have been the signee. So, the war continues ....
Declare victory and go home ... is not the same as a peace treaty. The phrase merely indicates a cessation of hostile hot war.
Also note that subtle difference: we are not at war with the people of country X, but with it's regime.
I think you are confused. The final instrument of surrender was signed by the allied powers, the Soviet Union, and Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel as representative of the Flensburg government headed by Doenitz. Jodl succeeded Keitel after Keitel's arrest. No peace treaty? Splitting up Germany and supervising its future life is a reasonable approximation. The NATO treaty is a peace treaty. Splitting imaginary hairs is pointless.
It is not about hairsplitting. It is what it is, read the book on the Control Authority. That is the source. Not some outside narrative.
BRD is an administrative corporation that still has to fulfill its prime objective namely a democratic election in which the German explicitly can choose a Constitution. For that to happen, de admin Corp must be dissolved. That is the reason why the German Reich institutions are still alive. Furthermore, BRD is treated AS an expression of sovereign will of the people, whereas it is not in a sovereign state. (See: Kanzler Brief).
So, there is no peace-treaty and the soil is still occupied territory.
The fact the BRD was incorporated into NATO was just a geopolitical move.....
Deep within the Archives of the Bundestag, concerning the unification of the two admin corps: BRD and DDR, is a doc with the real situation: BRD has not a real State, the so called nationality is fake, and the Bundesgerman nationality is not a nationality, as Germans are still Nationals of the German Reich
The WOII never ended as no peace treaty is in place with the German Reich. Even the unconditional surrender is not de jure, since it was signed by, if memory serves me well, Jodl, while the head of the State: Adm. Dönitz should have been the signee. So, the war continues ....
Declare victory and go home ... is not the same as a peace treaty. The phrase merely indicates a cessation of hostile hot war.
Also note that subtle difference: we are not at war with the people of country X, but with it's regime.
I think you are confused. The final instrument of surrender was signed by the allied powers, the Soviet Union, and Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel as representative of the Flensburg government headed by Doenitz. Jodl succeeded Keitel after Keitel's arrest. No peace treaty? Splitting up Germany and supervising its future life is a reasonable approximation. The NATO treaty is a peace treaty. Splitting imaginary hairs is pointless.
Thanks for the additions.
It is not about hairsplitting. It is what it is, read the book on the Control Authority. That is the source. Not some outside narrative.
BRD is an administrative corporation that still has to fulfill its prime objective namely a democratic election in which the German explicitly can choose a Constitution. For that to happen, de admin Corp must be dissolved. That is the reason why the German Reich institutions are still alive. Furthermore, BRD is treated AS an expression of sovereign will of the people, whereas it is not in a sovereign state. (See: Kanzler Brief).
So, there is no peace-treaty and the soil is still occupied territory.
The fact the BRD was incorporated into NATO was just a geopolitical move.....
Deep within the Archives of the Bundestag, concerning the unification of the two admin corps: BRD and DDR, is a doc with the real situation: BRD has not a real State, the so called nationality is fake, and the Bundesgerman nationality is not a nationality, as Germans are still Nationals of the German Reich
The difference between de jure and de facto.