Ask yourself, who has the best contract of these three people? Ingraham, Hannity, or Carlson?
To me, it's obvious that Carlson does. He joined Fox when their top rating O'Reilly was canned. This was after right after all the sex lawsuits against Fox. Yea, they gave Tucker Carlson a pretty darn good contract to which he wasn't limited to narratives to the degree that the other 2 were.
We know Fox is pushing for DeSantis, so Laura needs to play along. Ingraham, like other females, just don't ever like the "tone" of Trump. My wife says the same thing. But, you know what? They all agree with his policies. To them (including Ingraham) it's just the way he says it though. This happens to be a classic female construct to which they wittingly or unwittingly attack the messenger, but not the message. It's along the same meaningless rational as women voting for the candidate because of his hair, or looks. It's absolutely true. It doesn't matter what era we live in, or the education thereof, women will make small differences larger, and large differences smaller. This is why Thomas Jefferson said -- "Were our State a pure democracy . . .
there would yet be excluded from their deliberations . . . women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, should not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men."-- Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval (Sept. 5, 1816), in 10 Writings of Thomas Jefferson 45-46, n. 1 (P. Ford ed. 1899).
Ask yourself, who has the best contract of these three people? Ingraham, Hannity, or Carlson?
To me, it's obvious that Carlson does. He joined Fox when their top rating O'Reilly was canned. This was after right after all the sex lawsuits against Fox. Yea, they gave Tucker Carlson a pretty darn good contract to which he wasn't limited to narratives to the degree that the other 2 were.
We know Fox is pushing for DeSantis, so Laura needs to play along. Ingraham, like other females, just don't ever like the "tone" of Trump. My wife says the same thing. But, you know what? They all agree with his policies. To them (including Ingraham) it's just the way he says it though. This happens to be a classic female construct to which they wittingly or unwittingly attack the messenger, but not the message. It's along the same meaningless rational as women voting for the candidate because of his hair, or looks. It's absolutely true. It doesn't matter what era we live in, or the education thereof, women will make small differences larger, and large differences smaller. This is why Thomas Jefferson said -- "Were our State a pure democracy . . . there would yet be excluded from their deliberations . . . women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, should not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men."-- Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval (Sept. 5, 1816), in 10 Writings of Thomas Jefferson 45-46, n. 1 (P. Ford ed. 1899).
Being on Fox is a real challenge ....
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=q3lCfHtaR30
Frustration is killing ....
Look no further than Justin Trudeau.