We know that should that be it would never stick, but would allow a ton of evidence to be introduced, not only to the court, but to the American people.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
There are only two consecutive and identical drops mentioning a « first arrest »:
https://qalerts.app/?q=First+arrest
u/#q3717
So it definitely won’t be President Donald Trump as it would confuse rather than verify action and confirm future direction.
Why couldn't first indictment be of PDT, creating a mass awakening, and first arrest being PDT verify and confirm direction... being the military?
If Trump were arrested there would be a very high chance of a Trump supporter (or many) being emotionally triggered into violence - which would only suit the DS at this point.
If there were riots, then good people would get hurt - and that is directly opposite of Q's stated intent to reduce innocent casualties as much as possible.
Once you invoke the mob, it's very hard to put it back into its bottle. Antifa is an exception, because they were basically renta-mob - so when the money dried up they stopped.
I agree. That's why I think we would see instant Marshall Law and the beginning of the truth... not to mention control of the media (and EBS) by white hats. The people were peaceful on January 6th...
I think, through Durham, Trump has many more sealed indictments ready to fire than whatever bad guy.
Agreed... those indictments are out there. I guess my point has more to do with how to interpret the way Q worded the post. Since there is no indictment of PDT, yet (that we know of), perhaps it is saying the "first indictment of PDT" . The "unseal" does not necessarily have to refer to all the unsealed indictments, but could refer to the unsealing of the first indictment of PDT.
Or, it could be the Pope : )