Some deep psychological warfare in that series, for sure. They completely frame their argument that you are anti-truth, anti-freedom of speech, and anti-MAGA if you are argue their points. ...before anyone argued their points. What did the UN call that? Oh right, 'pre-bunking".
There are several reasons why we, the four of us, wanted to remain anonymous until the end of our series. The main reason lies in the true meaning of what an anon stands for. One that doesn’t want attention or needs recognition. Ones that seek truth, without retribution for finding it. Anonymous. We here at 17th SOG have many friends that we care about and respect that have very embedded theories.
Completely nonsensical. I mean for one, who asked?
Two, they want to be anonymous to prove they are not in it for attention. ...until they gladly tell us who they are at "the end of the series". What purpose would that serve? Right, attention.
Theories that we once believed as fact as well. That, if we were to go against these theories, we would be banned and attacked. This is the reality that we are in unfortunately.
Right there. What is the only real theory of reclamation of good in this world today, second to God? The Great Awakening. They know anons of this movement are going to, rightfully, call them out as shills.
yes that part too, trying to explain their motivation etc ... who cares? Write the research, provide a few links, and get on with your day. I don't need to read someone's diary.
Patriots, are we truth seekers? If so, what does that truly mean? Seeking truth sometimes means challenging our current narratives.
To me, he giveaway on their agenda when they call what we do "narratives".
Narratives?
Like we are making up fictional stories to tell the public instead of trying to figure out the truth.
Reality: Obama and Hillary left the Libyan ambassador to die in Benghazi (if not helped create the circumstances for his brutal death).
Narrative: A You Tuber made a video that sparked the attack in Benghazi.
See how that word is used.
So they regard they we need our "works of fictions/ narratives" tweaked. aka "lie better".
We may not be right, but we are certainly aren't trying to make up lies to trick the public. We are trying our best to figure out the TRUTH that DS minions are hell-bent on covering up.
Would any of you ever say the phrase to another anon, "Hey, pede, work on your narrative about Q. Public isn't buying the current one. Come up with a better story."
that statement by 17 psyop reminds me of that video, which are the 4 am taking points sent out to MSM, an effort to control the narrative.
So when they are telling me that arguing their points is extremely dangerous for the movement ... that seems like an effort to control the narrative and that's a big red flag for me. That's a nope, actually. For me.
DON'T YOU KNOW THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY?????
hahahahahaha... sorry... had to. Sarcasm from me, of course.
I posted about this ghosty-foursome the other day. Not sure who the hell they are or why their style of research is any better than what Anons do on this Board... and why their letter was necessary in the first place.
Lol... that was on purpose... for sarcastic effect, or to make you imagine that I was screaming like a lunatic.
I agree with your point and was just having fun with your video link. As I watched it again I couldn't help but think about how the sheeple tune into the anchor/spokesperson with whom they have a lot of comfort, and take them seriously when they say something is "seriously dangerous to our democracy." I mean, really? You, or me, or someone sits in our living room and soaks up statements like that from a TV personality? Yep... that's what the sheeple do.
Anyway, thanks for sharing that video again. It had been a while since I've viewed it...
"Attacking others for having a different opinion is very shallow minded and extremely dangerous for our movement. The MAGA movement."
4 am talking point? nope.
Some deep psychological warfare in that series, for sure. They completely frame their argument that you are anti-truth, anti-freedom of speech, and anti-MAGA if you are argue their points. ...before anyone argued their points. What did the UN call that? Oh right, 'pre-bunking".
I'd like to point out this passage as well:
Completely nonsensical. I mean for one, who asked?
Two, they want to be anonymous to prove they are not in it for attention. ...until they gladly tell us who they are at "the end of the series". What purpose would that serve? Right, attention.
Right there. What is the only real theory of reclamation of good in this world today, second to God? The Great Awakening. They know anons of this movement are going to, rightfully, call them out as shills.
Careful who you follow.
yes that part too, trying to explain their motivation etc ... who cares? Write the research, provide a few links, and get on with your day. I don't need to read someone's diary.
u/dty6
To me, he giveaway on their agenda when they call what we do "narratives".
Narratives?
Like we are making up fictional stories to tell the public instead of trying to figure out the truth.
Reality: Obama and Hillary left the Libyan ambassador to die in Benghazi (if not helped create the circumstances for his brutal death).
Narrative: A You Tuber made a video that sparked the attack in Benghazi.
See how that word is used.
So they regard they we need our "works of fictions/ narratives" tweaked. aka "lie better".
We may not be right, but we are certainly aren't trying to make up lies to trick the public. We are trying our best to figure out the TRUTH that DS minions are hell-bent on covering up.
Would any of you ever say the phrase to another anon, "Hey, pede, work on your narrative about Q. Public isn't buying the current one. Come up with a better story."
Calling it a narrative means "lie better".
Not sure what you mean. Could you elaborate?
Sure. Do you remember this video?
https://youtu.be/ranFhYpq6UE.
sorry for yt
that statement by 17 psyop reminds me of that video, which are the 4 am taking points sent out to MSM, an effort to control the narrative.
So when they are telling me that arguing their points is extremely dangerous for the movement ... that seems like an effort to control the narrative and that's a big red flag for me. That's a nope, actually. For me.
STFU!!!
DON'T YOU KNOW THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY?????
hahahahahaha... sorry... had to. Sarcasm from me, of course.
I posted about this ghosty-foursome the other day. Not sure who the hell they are or why their style of research is any better than what Anons do on this Board... and why their letter was necessary in the first place.
ALL OF THOSE CAPS WERE LOUD, FREN!
I don't mind reading someone's research or ideas buttttttt I do not like to be told what to do, evah.
Lol... that was on purpose... for sarcastic effect, or to make you imagine that I was screaming like a lunatic.
I agree with your point and was just having fun with your video link. As I watched it again I couldn't help but think about how the sheeple tune into the anchor/spokesperson with whom they have a lot of comfort, and take them seriously when they say something is "seriously dangerous to our democracy." I mean, really? You, or me, or someone sits in our living room and soaks up statements like that from a TV personality? Yep... that's what the sheeple do.
Anyway, thanks for sharing that video again. It had been a while since I've viewed it...
I did think you were a lunatic! just playing with you, thanks for your comments. Have a great rest of the day!
STOP YELLING! LOUD NOISES TRIGGER ME.
No clapping in the chat. Use jazz hands.
u/dty6.
lol... I LOVE jazz hands
hahahaha
What is "4 am talking point" I keep seeing people say this ...?
a quick internet search will help you, or you can continue reading this thread where a detailed explanation is provided