Article does not mention any specific mistakes she thinks they made. Saying we are making changes is not the same thing as admitting that what was done prior to the change(s) was a mistake. I want someone in authority to admit they screwed up when they said to mask, social distance, vaccinate, etc. Only then will I even begin to entertain what any of the quacks claiming to be doctors have to say.
—Increasing use of preprint scientific reports to get out actionable data, instead of waiting for research to go through peer review and publication by the CDC journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
It could be proactive, but I’m skeptical and expect that to mean they want to push BS studies with less accountability.
All of this maneuvering by the CDC along with the "power people" catching COVID lately for plausible deniability is an effort to save their happy ass from what is coming at them this fall from Russia (there will be a lot more countries) with charges of crimes against humanity.
Article does not mention any specific mistakes she thinks they made. Saying we are making changes is not the same thing as admitting that what was done prior to the change(s) was a mistake. I want someone in authority to admit they screwed up when they said to mask, social distance, vaccinate, etc. Only then will I even begin to entertain what any of the quacks claiming to be doctors have to say.
I find this line to be a double edged sword.
It could be proactive, but I’m skeptical and expect that to mean they want to push BS studies with less accountability.
Basically normalizing not waiting for research results.
Its unethical to withhold any vaccine from anyone while pesky safety tests are being fabricated
All of this maneuvering by the CDC along with the "power people" catching COVID lately for plausible deniability is an effort to save their happy ass from what is coming at them this fall from Russia (there will be a lot more countries) with charges of crimes against humanity.