āMan youāve been a naughty boy / You let your face grow longā
REAL Paul McCartney had a shorter, more delicate 'heart-shaped' face. His lower jaw and chin came more to a point, vs. a squarish long silhouette.
Replacement ('Faul') has a noticeably longer/oblong face, with a long wide chin. So beards were also used to initially blur that difference.
Plus - he is way taller. Two things they couldn't alter. But people should not of course believe their lying eyes.
Also EVERYTHING public that could be digitized, HAS been altered by now (in the same way chemtrails were inserted into digitized classic movies).
Not in every single scene - but enough to lie and blur and blend.
[I mean, e.g., pay no attention to Jesus on the cross in DVDs of the Ben Hur film - utterly overflown with florid neon chemtrails (even so, 'subliminally' present) that dominate and streak the entire sky. A wee tad bit of overkill...?]
But - why would persistent chemtrails be appearing in the cinematographic skies of the late '50s (!!!), when Ben Hur was filmed?
Contrails existed, but a true CONTRAIL is a very slender, vanishing line of trailing ice crystals, that quickly disappeared behind an aircraft. Not fat, puffy, corkscrew persistent 'clouds' widening into artificial overcast. Was this supposed to portray the skies of 33 AD?
They've of course been lying to us by doctoring IMAGES for a very long time.
So as with Paul, chemtrails, etc. - look at the VERY end of most DVD/digitized classic movie credits, and you may just run across the very same digital processing facilities, over and over. Unless they omit that now.
For some (all-seeing) eye-opening research, just get some 2nd hand VHS tapes and compare with older DVDs of the same footage.
āPaul Is Deadā Clues in āI Am the Walrusā _ Turn Me On, Dead Man
And most of all - you are so right, sAVAge_bEaST. Paul was a genius. Lennon-and-McCartney resonated with an irreplaceable synergy. People who test the 'vibrational frequency' signatures of music, report their music tests out as highly positive.
So yes, possibly most telling of all is that after the switch - the music changed.
Honestly, as a musician... I'm finding tuning to 417hz an even more pleasant sound and feeling. Apparently tuning to 417hz allows the guitar to play the healing tone of 528hz.
My guitar just booms when I tune to 417hz.
Also... 417hz was what the old baroque guitars were tuned to.
The death of Paul is an entry conspiracy theory. Once you realize how much you've been lied to about the Beatles, even if only in small ways where you still think Paul is Paul, it primes you for accepting that much of your culture has been a psy-op and false.
His dad was a freemason. Read the book. Research and find if you want. The whole movement of "free love" and drugs was Tavistock. Read the book by Dr. John Coleman. Available on z-lib.org.
Iāve forgotten which Beatles tune when played backwards says:
āPaul is deadā¦.miss himā¦miss him.ā
Plus, the classic āA Day In The Lifeā says āHe blew his mind out in a carā¦he hadnāt noticed that the lights had changedā. Some say thatās how the original Paul died.
At first I did find it especially devastating , since I grew up loving the Beatles.
Plus, I am a bass player by profession, so I was extra curious .
I spent many months researching and watching every band interview and live footage I could find, and at that point there was tons. Often when I'd go back later and look for something I'd seen, it would have been removed.
I also found it helpful reading the book "Memoirs of Billy Shears", first edition. In the second edition he tried to make himself more likeable.
Some of the most well known PID researchers have great points, but they seem to miss the mark in key areas.
The best researcher I found at that time was Clare Kuehn. Her FB group called Paul McCartney death & replacement study group had a lot of good info.
I tend to agree with Clare on his death being somewhere around Sept. 11-13 1966.
Also there were plenty of accounts of people who heard an initial special news report on the radio that he died and then never heard any follow up.
Do you have a link to the Juan episode? I heard him once mention it briefly months ago, but that's it.
His interview was with the flyover conservative podcast on Rumble about a week ago. I also am a guitar player and I play lots of Beatles music. I heard these PID rumors decades ago but ignored them because they were so far out there. I mean, how could the even find a mirror image, left handed bass player so quickly? I still doubt these rumors however when Juan O savin said it it made me rethink. But then again I love JOS but I've only been listening to home for a year or so
Being you too listen to JOS, it seems like you have a good ability to discern the resonance of truth. So if you feel like going down the PID rabbit hole, reading the first edition of Memoirs (it has a red cover) is worthwhile. Even though it is a fictionalized account, the book has a tone and level of detail which rang true to me, especially as a musician. That was the final straw that convinced me beyond doubt. I was already convinced from internet deep diving.
There are still many huge question marks regarding all the details. Faul aka Billy or William was a session musician who had an excellent ear to mimic and perhaps was selected and groomed for the position way in advance . There was possibly a look alike contest as well.
Possible scenarios are he died naturally in a car wreck or was murdered for not complying with the satanic agenda.
After the final USA tour there was a period of months off from public life, and it is thought that in that period it gave Faul time to train, get plastic surgery in Africa, & the rest of the band time to mourn.
Learning to play lefty was the biggest hurdle. But in the studio he could play righty.
Thanks for the link, I started it. Juan said he died 9-11- 67 then corrected himself to say 11-9.
There is a lot of discrepancy over which date , due to in Europe they write the date first and number of the month second. I think Juan made a mistake, and it was 1966, before the release of Sg. Peppers.
I don't have any of the old links I used, but here is a fun snippet, where george hints at the truth. At 2;24 He says "we all loved him so much (john) and we all loved paul very much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO-HK_csGwk
Thanks for the link. I really watching that live but didn't pick up his comment at the time. Means more now. Very interesting. Why wasn't Paul there at the HOF induction? Another interesting note. Not sure about this whole PID thing still but it's much more plausible nowadays after I've been red pilled. Another unintended consequence of seeking truth I guess. Thanks for everything šŗšøš
I feel like this was the first rabbit hole for many others but I have just learned this here. I watched the doco and it was very convincing. I must admit it was much easier to believe than flat earth or theory of gravity being wrong. I reckon we may be in for more red pills in the near future too. ( dietary lies are rife too )
Faul McCartney?? The Fake Paul..
He did die.. he was waking up,, being used by Tavistock..
Faul is a puppet.. Paul was a genius.
Watch this
https://flixhouse.com/v/2705
āMan youāve been a naughty boy / You let your face grow longā
REAL Paul McCartney had a shorter, more delicate 'heart-shaped' face. His lower jaw and chin came more to a point, vs. a squarish long silhouette.
Replacement ('Faul') has a noticeably longer/oblong face, with a long wide chin. So beards were also used to initially blur that difference.
Plus - he is way taller. Two things they couldn't alter. But people should not of course believe their lying eyes.
Also EVERYTHING public that could be digitized, HAS been altered by now (in the same way chemtrails were inserted into digitized classic movies).
Not in every single scene - but enough to lie and blur and blend.
[I mean, e.g., pay no attention to Jesus on the cross in DVDs of the Ben Hur film - utterly overflown with florid neon chemtrails (even so, 'subliminally' present) that dominate and streak the entire sky. A wee tad bit of overkill...?]
But - why would persistent chemtrails be appearing in the cinematographic skies of the late '50s (!!!), when Ben Hur was filmed?
Contrails existed, but a true CONTRAIL is a very slender, vanishing line of trailing ice crystals, that quickly disappeared behind an aircraft. Not fat, puffy, corkscrew persistent 'clouds' widening into artificial overcast. Was this supposed to portray the skies of 33 AD?
They've of course been lying to us by doctoring IMAGES for a very long time.
So as with Paul, chemtrails, etc. - look at the VERY end of most DVD/digitized classic movie credits, and you may just run across the very same digital processing facilities, over and over. Unless they omit that now.
For some (all-seeing) eye-opening research, just get some 2nd hand VHS tapes and compare with older DVDs of the same footage.
https://turnmeondeadman.com/paul-is-dead-clues-in-i-am-the-walrus
āPaul Is Deadā Clues in āI Am the Walrusā _ Turn Me On, Dead Man
And most of all - you are so right, sAVAge_bEaST. Paul was a genius. Lennon-and-McCartney resonated with an irreplaceable synergy. People who test the 'vibrational frequency' signatures of music, report their music tests out as highly positive.
So yes, possibly most telling of all is that after the switch - the music changed.
Good stuff. TYā¦
Also ,. Paul ( the real one ) and John, recorded their early work at 432 Hz.
Honestly, as a musician... I'm finding tuning to 417hz an even more pleasant sound and feeling. Apparently tuning to 417hz allows the guitar to play the healing tone of 528hz.
My guitar just booms when I tune to 417hz.
Also... 417hz was what the old baroque guitars were tuned to.
"The walrus is Paul"
I had never seen that video even though I knew about his death. The interesting twist was "Heather". Thanks for sharing.
The death of Paul is an entry conspiracy theory. Once you realize how much you've been lied to about the Beatles, even if only in small ways where you still think Paul is Paul, it primes you for accepting that much of your culture has been a psy-op and false.
Yeah Most people donāt know Paul was a twin
..and John Lennon is Mark Staycer.
Sorry dude. Fan here too.
http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf
The double switch.
Two mathis posts in one evening??? Not sure I buy it all but itās good fan fiction
His dad was a freemason. Read the book. Research and find if you want. The whole movement of "free love" and drugs was Tavistock. Read the book by Dr. John Coleman. Available on z-lib.org.
Billy shears
Iāve forgotten which Beatles tune when played backwards says:
āPaul is deadā¦.miss himā¦miss him.ā
Plus, the classic āA Day In The Lifeā says āHe blew his mind out in a carā¦he hadnāt noticed that the lights had changedā. Some say thatās how the original Paul died.
Remember that hysteria about the "rumor" that Paul died in the late Sixties? What if it was not a rumor and the band knew it had a good thing going?
I saw him at LAX in 69!
It ('allegedly' of course) happened quite a bit earlier, not in 1969.
By 1969 this (highly lucrative and destructive) MK deception had established its tentacles everywhere.
It was possibly in late November 1966 (Nov. 9?), or early 1967 (Jan. 7 has been claimed.)
Ah, PID used to be one of my favorite subjects!
At first I did find it especially devastating , since I grew up loving the Beatles. Plus, I am a bass player by profession, so I was extra curious .
I spent many months researching and watching every band interview and live footage I could find, and at that point there was tons. Often when I'd go back later and look for something I'd seen, it would have been removed.
I also found it helpful reading the book "Memoirs of Billy Shears", first edition. In the second edition he tried to make himself more likeable.
Some of the most well known PID researchers have great points, but they seem to miss the mark in key areas. The best researcher I found at that time was Clare Kuehn. Her FB group called Paul McCartney death & replacement study group had a lot of good info.
I tend to agree with Clare on his death being somewhere around Sept. 11-13 1966. Also there were plenty of accounts of people who heard an initial special news report on the radio that he died and then never heard any follow up.
Do you have a link to the Juan episode? I heard him once mention it briefly months ago, but that's it.
His interview was with the flyover conservative podcast on Rumble about a week ago. I also am a guitar player and I play lots of Beatles music. I heard these PID rumors decades ago but ignored them because they were so far out there. I mean, how could the even find a mirror image, left handed bass player so quickly? I still doubt these rumors however when Juan O savin said it it made me rethink. But then again I love JOS but I've only been listening to home for a year or so
Being you too listen to JOS, it seems like you have a good ability to discern the resonance of truth. So if you feel like going down the PID rabbit hole, reading the first edition of Memoirs (it has a red cover) is worthwhile. Even though it is a fictionalized account, the book has a tone and level of detail which rang true to me, especially as a musician. That was the final straw that convinced me beyond doubt. I was already convinced from internet deep diving.
There are still many huge question marks regarding all the details. Faul aka Billy or William was a session musician who had an excellent ear to mimic and perhaps was selected and groomed for the position way in advance . There was possibly a look alike contest as well.
Possible scenarios are he died naturally in a car wreck or was murdered for not complying with the satanic agenda. After the final USA tour there was a period of months off from public life, and it is thought that in that period it gave Faul time to train, get plastic surgery in Africa, & the rest of the band time to mourn.
Learning to play lefty was the biggest hurdle. But in the studio he could play righty.
Thanks for the link, I started it. Juan said he died 9-11- 67 then corrected himself to say 11-9. There is a lot of discrepancy over which date , due to in Europe they write the date first and number of the month second. I think Juan made a mistake, and it was 1966, before the release of Sg. Peppers.
I don't have any of the old links I used, but here is a fun snippet, where george hints at the truth. At 2;24 He says "we all loved him so much (john) and we all loved paul very much. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO-HK_csGwk
Thanks for the link. I really watching that live but didn't pick up his comment at the time. Means more now. Very interesting. Why wasn't Paul there at the HOF induction? Another interesting note. Not sure about this whole PID thing still but it's much more plausible nowadays after I've been red pilled. Another unintended consequence of seeking truth I guess. Thanks for everything šŗšøš
The truth doesn't care if as a huge Beatles fan you find this disturbing. You should find it worthy of investigation.
It may be true, look how they pulled off JFK murder and 9/11. It is plausible and I wonder if Faux Paul will confess on his death bed.
I feel like this was the first rabbit hole for many others but I have just learned this here. I watched the doco and it was very convincing. I must admit it was much easier to believe than flat earth or theory of gravity being wrong. I reckon we may be in for more red pills in the near future too. ( dietary lies are rife too )