Vax: “It’s a _chemical_ weapon — it’s not even a bio-weapon.”
(www.bitchute.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Thank for one of the most informative 2 hours I’ve listened to in a long long time.
I would consider the vaccine as a state-of-the-art chemical weapon.
Even moreso if it was deployed via areosol misters (god help us if they do that).
All the evidence has been there for awhile now. Yet The Jab continues.
Getting in to the deep good stuff at the end...fake science for comms. Nuclear physics, particle physics, quantum physics...
A chemical weapon is a biological weapon. They are one and the same.
Not according to the military; they make a clear distinction between radiological, chemical, and biological weapons. Each one has its own distinct methods to combat and control. Chemical weapons rely on caustic, blistering, or noxious gases to cause harm, biological weapons rely on biological organisms to cause harm. The are completely different. And radiological weapons...well, nuclear weapons, dirty bombs, and that sort of thing.
The three entities are completely different. Maybe this will help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQFE113iDx4
Agent orange is a chemical weapon, nothing biological about a super-weedkiller.