Christian School will only refer to students by the sex they were assigned at birth... Really, we are now using their terminology "assigned at birth"? - The Great Awakening

Christian School will only refer to students by the sex they were assigned at birth... Really, we are now using their terminology "assigned at birth"? (www.thegatewaypundit.com)

posted 2 years ago by Greatheart 2 years ago by Greatheart +96 / -3

15 comments

15 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (15)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– SemperSupra 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

So...

Left: sexual orientation is not a choice. You have no ability to decide who you sleep with it.

Also Left: The genitals you are born with are a choice. You can choose your sex chromosomes.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– VaccinesCauseSIDS 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Bisexuality debunks the myth that sexual orientation isn't a choice

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– SemperSupra 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

What's weird is that every bisexual I've ever known has ended up dating only the opposite gender. The whole "choice" thing runs into a problem when one group refuses to choose you back. A lot of gays refuse to date bisexuals because they don't trust that they'll "choose" them. They look at it as "if you can choose to be straight then you will be straight".

It's really messed up when you think about it. All that talk of "pride" is hollow in the end. Even they think a partner would only choose them if they have no choice.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q