It's over. Feds used Dennis Montgomery's technology to hijack the election.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
I read it and understand it just fine.
Oh, I understand it no problem.
I'm a linguist and a trained text analyst. I'm just looking at the text through that professional knowledge. Text analysis involves examining texts, analysing them to extract information about who, what, when, how, etc. It's a science-type subject, built on linguistic research.
All I'm saying is that the text itself is totally incongruous with the idea that the author is a professional, an engineer, or technically expert person. And, that opinion is not simply a layman's opinion, fwiw.
There was way much more presented during the presentation. It was really good, you should watch it.
Sure.
But WHERE is the OP's content from? Simple question, isn't it?
It is a clip from the Lindell Moment of Truth Summitt.
Sorry, I thought everyone knew about it, we have been talking about it for a couple days.
https://rumble.com/v1g407t-live-the-moment-of-truth-summit-by-mike-lindell-in-springfield-mo-8-21-2022.html
No offense.
English text Nazis over think communication and grammar. I make tons of typos. It doesn’t mean anything.
No offense at all. Coz I'm 100% absolutely not a grammar nazi. I have learned, studied, and taught language in a wide variety of contexts, and I understand it on a level that essentially 95% of people who haven't studied language as a science don't.
No more than passengers on a jet understand and can operate or grasp everything involved in actually flying a jet, or building one.
But, you're wrong about communication. Grammar nazis generally do not understand the significance or place of communication in the language systems.
Also, just because your typos don't mean anything to you, doesn't mean they don't mean anything. They do. But very possibly they don't negatively impact your ability to communicate in a wide variety of contexts, including an internet forum board.
But if you were a lawyer, or a serious biological scientist, or an engineer, your typos very well could have a significant impact.
Context is EVERYTHING.
Cheers.
I am a software engineer.
Grammar depends on the setting of where we are communicating and why.
For Example: I am on a message board to learn about news that the MSM won’t post.
I don’t worry too much about making a typo or grammar issue here.
As long as the person can understand what I am trying to communicate. That’s good enough for me.
In a more professional corporate setting. I tend to do more proof reading.
I am in the process of taking some English courses.
I love learning. So I thought it would be fun to brush up on the technical side of language.
What I have learned about this.
When speaking out loud. It’s very easy to get grammar rules wrong. This is because how quick your mind has to send out a message.
What I think happens a lot.
We type as we are speaking out loud. Even though no sound might come out of our mouths.
Internally as we typo out a message. Our minds is having an inner conversation.
This is why I am more forgiving to broken grammar.
It’s happens because we are combining typing skills with the speed of thought.
That’s why rules are broken.
Hope this makes sense.