All the papers you linked that claim to isolate the virus, do exactly what Cowan explained in this video. They innoculate the sample with a bunch of other stuff, observe the cytopathic effect and claim they isolated the virus.

And the papers you linked that claim to sequence the virus, again do exactly what Cowan says they do. Break everything to pieces. Pick nucleotide strings, re-assemble it based on a template, and claim the genome has been sequenced.

Also everything you wrote actually agrees with what Cowan says as objective facts. Only your subjective belief that "this is how you isolate virus" is where you differ, and that is exactly what he says right in the beginning of the video.

I love this, because every time someone tries to debunk these theories, they end up bolstering it. This is how I started paying serious attention to these. Originally I had written it off as crap shit. So thanks for that (not you personally, but people such as yourself who had the same arguments with me a few months ago)

well, yes, that is how you isolate a virus.

Why ? Because a guy in 1954 did it that way after people spent 20 years looking for a virus in the electron microscope and failed?

It's like saying Walls in houses don't exist, show me any house where they've managed to put up walls without using screws or nails, you won't find it.

Thats an incorrect analogy. That would be correct if, say viruses came attached with some things that are required for their structural existence.

In your example, you are interested in walls, but they come attached to the house with screws. So in this example, isolating a virus is parallel to isolating the house.

If your point is that its impossible to isolate a virus for whatever reason, it does not matter what the reason is, then the answer is "With the current known techniques, we cannot isolate a virus, but we can infer its existence through indirect means" and at that point those indirect means becomes a subjective criteria. But the current science pretends that its an objective fact.

With Viruses you need to be able to keep the thing alive long enough to image it

From: https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus-resource-center

_ infectious viral particles that can float or drift around in the air. Aerosols are emitted by a person infected with coronavirus — even one with no symptoms — when they talk, breathe, cough, or sneeze. Another person can breathe in these aerosols and become infected with the virus. Aerosolized coronavirus can remain in the air for up to three hours. A mask can help prevent that spread._

if they can stick around in the air for 3 hours without any nutrients, I am sue it can stick around for the time you are isolating it.

Notice the word sterilized, that means it is essentially pasteurized and the viruses that may exist inside are killed so they can mix it with infected fluids and isolate the virus.

This would have been a valid argument if Cowan claimed that cow milk contains viruses and are being detected. But thats not what he is saying. He is saying that what we are looking for are pieces of RNA, and even sterilised cow milk will contain the pieces of RNA belonging to the cells in the milk.

Claiming there are no viruses is the same ballpark as flat earth

This is a strawman argument.

Cowan never claimed viruses dont exist. He even talks about certain viruses in the ocean that have been isolated and observed under a microscope. His claim is that no one has proven that the entities claimed to be viruses are the entities that cause the diseases attributed to those viruses.

study them under the extremely high powered microscope to determine what virus they had so it could be treated

I am very interested in knowing what was the process you used to determine what virus the horses had. What exactly did you see on the slides? How did you determine what virus the horse had?