Daily Call To Action Repost #3 (will repost until September 3 when it will be deleted)
The plan is to get Sheriffs to start investigations & force all machines to not be used during the election as a result. Sounded like the data we collect can be run against multiple TB of data Lindell has.
Lindell has many Sheriffs ready, to teach other unaware Sheriffs, how to find/verify the fraud themselves so they can take the machines before the machines can be used in elections.
They showed machine fraud in every single county so far that used machines (even Trump won counties & states).
Step 1 Check this site to see if your county is already listed. http://ordros.com/cvr/
If your county is listed, skip to Step 3.
Step 2 We must get these Cast Vote Records immediately in every single county. You can can either review Lone Racoon's in depth guide, in the link, or you can read the basics that I have laid out: https://magaraccoon.com/docs/cvrsfordummiesv2.pdf
This is the link to Lindell's site to find info yourself with an email & phone request- https://frankspeech.com/article/save-your-county
Screenshot of that page: https://files.catbox.moe/0doyv9.jpg
Lindell's site text:
INSTRUCTIONS
The Cast Vote Records are the clearest indicators of whether or not there is machine-based election fraud. On September 3, 2022, federal protections for these records under Title 52 Section 20701 comes to an end allowing the legal destruction of these records. Don’t let these records disappear from the public conscience. Please use the following form language to request the Cast Vote Records for the 2020 General Election from your county and municipal clerks before it is too late. Copy and paste the template below and supply the value for your jurisdiction and send to your county and municipal clerks.
(copy & paste the form below, update the jurisdiction with your county)
FORM
Pursuant to our state’s freedom of information law, please remit the Cast Vote Records [insert jurisdiction] from the 2020 General Election. These records should include the following fields as a minimum:
- CVR Record #
- Timestamp
- Tabulator ID
- Municipality
- Precinct
- Batch ID
- Record ID
- Counting Group
- Session Type
- Ballot Type ID
- Paper Index
- Contest
- Candidate
- Undervotes
- Overvotes
- Mark Density
Lone Racoon has some tips for getting those records here: https://magaraccoon.com/foia.html
There was an organization ready to help anyone who gets pushback from their county clerks. The Cause of America is the group name I heard listening to the Lindell event. I think this is their site- https://causeofamerica.org/
Step 3
When you get your Cast Vote Records (assuming they are not in the system above already) email that file to [email protected]
Step 4
Start digging for fraud. I am looking into how to do this myself, I believe Lone Racoon had some info on http://ordros.com on how to do it. https://magaraccoon.com/ has a wealth of information & I am still digging into it. I will put highlights here as I find them. Always grateful for suggestions & pointers.
Step 5
Report fraud to Sheriffs & share with local friends so they can tell Sheriffs too.
(I need to find the style/editing info post about green letters, italics, etc... Will update this to look better once I find those instructions for future posts).
My state told me they are confidential, so I went to an election lawyer, who I cannot day I trust and his answer " I believe it is confidential under state law". The email from the elections board was " in our view, it's confidential." Obviously these fuckos are lying. I just don't think I am can get witnesses to come with me. With that being said, is anyone out there a professional and can verify if it is even possible for this to be confidential? Thanks in advance.
Utah has tried doing this to Two Red Pills IIRC
I am thinking witnesses make it so they can't pull a 1v1 he said/she said type argument in court. Maybe (depending on your state laws) you could record the conversation on your phone when you are requesting those records. Ask them what the state statute is that makes those public records confidential?
I can tell you what Salt Lake County quoted me.
20A-4-202 20A-4-104(10) 63G-2-201(3), 20A-4-202, and 20A-5-408.
"The information you have requested is sealed pursuant to these provisions and may not be disclosed."
https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title20A/Chapter4/20A-4-S202.html
It is late & I have an early morning tomorrow. #4.a.ii seems they are figuring a contest is needed.
I will show the sheriff the video of how easy it is to fall outside of the recount numbers via malicious code & see whar they can offer.
If the votes never fall within the low contested numbers, via code in the machines, then it seems this law may prevent us from ever being able to challenge the machines. It could be designed that way.
Of course.
Herbert / Cox got 45% of the vote at the GOP convention in 2016 and had to go to primary. Where they ended up with 72% of the vote.
Utah is full of whacky results like that. What happens at convention is way out of kilter with what subsequently happens with voters at large.
Happened with Romney / Kennedy in 2018. With Andrew Badger's race this year.
This RINO article blames the GOP delegates for being "out of touch" with voters.
https://universe.byu.edu/2019/01/10/romney-election-exemplifies-disparity-between-gop-convention-population/
I think it's more the other way around, but delegates probably need to do a better job reaching out voters and explaining why convention turned out the way it did.
So there may be a little of that. And a lot of vote tampering.
20A-4-104(10) does not seem to cover testing for wifi chips (or any method) that would allow access to the internet.
63G-2-201(3)
Seems we need to make them expidited requests & it needs to be for public benefit. Unfortunately this may require a judge of some sort to rule this is in the public interest.
Though
(5) Any person who requests a record to obtain information for a story or report for publication or broadcast to the general public is presumed to be acting to benefit the public rather than a person.
So this should be expidited since we are looking to broadcast this via this website or via Frank Speech.
Are they trying to claim you are doing this as a personal thing instead of for public interest?
In 63G-2-201(3)
I found this that may or may not really apply.
Dagnabit, we may need a lawyer that is willing to take it on 🤨
I am sending out something to the county attorney of a different county tomorrow.
The clerk of that county referred me to him. Didn't give me a flat-out NO. We'll see what develops.
Yeah they told me the statute, it just didn't make sense to me as it seemed like it wouldn't cover this. However we all know they can say whatever, I just don't want to walk in there if in deed it is state law. I fucking hate our completely broken system. How can they hold information from our election system for our elections. We pay for it, we own it. Such bullshit, if you cannot tell I am a little pissed lol.
I did just check for my state and it appears like they only one posted is a SOVC as well, not the CVR. determining if I should go ahead and upload the SOVC I was able to get. (SOVC = statement of votes cast)
Now that I think about it, the Lt Gov in Utah had claimed that the data Two Red Pills were requesting was only allowed to go to candidates. Possibly we need to get any candidate from that time to get those records in these problem areas.
Not even candidates are able to get election data. Bill Lee, Utah County commissioner lost his reelection bid, is not able to get CVR data.
Some guy in Washington Co I believe lost an election by something ridiculous like 7 votes, requested a hand recount, was refused by the Lt Gov because the ballots must be "kept pristine" or some horseshit like that.
Utah pols got this rigged system sewn up for them starting decades ago. No recall.
Oh nice! I contacted [email protected] and the dudes at ondros.com. I am hoping they grt back to me tomorrow, however I may go ahead and try to contact someone from the election as well. Thank you for this, it's a good idea!
And thank you btw for the response!
Washington? They're acting like there's private information involved. Or, that they're the same as ballots and aren't publically available.
IN