If you think some of the things people have been saying is simply criticism then you must have had a really tough childhood. I apologize.
FYI, the post that sparked all of this is literally talking about disallowing people from doing X/Y/Z. That goes against the Constitution, and is inherently not criticism, but a demand.
Wrong. That post did not advocate forcefully preventing homos from taking it up the ass. Here's a quote from it: "We all said years ago that if it was allowed to be openly accepted and legalized they'd eventually come for the children and animals. And look at where we are now."
And he is exactly right. Paleoconservatives warned about this for decades and were ridiculed and demeaned and told their slippery slope argument was nonsense. Yet here we are. Nowhere did he say that we should lock up homos, castrate them, execute them etc. Why do faggots always insist on being so damned intellectually dishonest?
"the post that sparked all of this is literally talking about disallowing people from doing X/Y/Z. That goes against the Constitution, and is inherently not criticism, but a demand."
The post is literally saying that we can't accept it here. That we can't keep "pretending it's 'OK to be any flavor of the rainbow brigade". That we can't allow any of it in the public square.
Additionally:
"All most of us want is something similiar to what most Slavic Nations have going on, where it's illegal and a felony to advertise homosexuality, transsexualism, etc. in any way, shape, form, or fashion, and public displays of such things are also banned."
That is literally talking about banning some aspect of it. This is against the Constitution outright.
If you think some of the things people have been saying is simply criticism then you must have had a really tough childhood. I apologize.
FYI, the post that sparked all of this is literally talking about disallowing people from doing X/Y/Z. That goes against the Constitution, and is inherently not criticism, but a demand.
Wrong. That post did not advocate forcefully preventing homos from taking it up the ass. Here's a quote from it: "We all said years ago that if it was allowed to be openly accepted and legalized they'd eventually come for the children and animals. And look at where we are now."
And he is exactly right. Paleoconservatives warned about this for decades and were ridiculed and demeaned and told their slippery slope argument was nonsense. Yet here we are. Nowhere did he say that we should lock up homos, castrate them, execute them etc. Why do faggots always insist on being so damned intellectually dishonest?
That's not what I said it said.
Why do faggots always insist on being so damned intellectually dishonest?
"the post that sparked all of this is literally talking about disallowing people from doing X/Y/Z. That goes against the Constitution, and is inherently not criticism, but a demand."
Seems like what you were claiming to me.
The post is literally saying that we can't accept it here. That we can't keep "pretending it's 'OK to be any flavor of the rainbow brigade". That we can't allow any of it in the public square.
Additionally:
"All most of us want is something similiar to what most Slavic Nations have going on, where it's illegal and a felony to advertise homosexuality, transsexualism, etc. in any way, shape, form, or fashion, and public displays of such things are also banned."
That is literally talking about banning some aspect of it. This is against the Constitution outright.