I think, there are cyberattacks that have happened and continue to happen. They get blamed on Russia without reason, then it turns out it’s actually somebody within ‘US’ us. Attacking things and collecting data because they can?
The overall theory I’m seeing is that Q has some very talented data collection teams and they have everything. By everything they mean everything, proof of all the fraud, crimes and illegal activities.
I've tried to follow some decoders as complex as serial brain and others more simple, and also started combining observations about the 8 types of smart - we all have some level of intelligence around logic, words, art, body/movement, music, self, others, nature (patterns).
Those who post the decodes seem to have a great level of logic and pattern recognition, so the conclusions feel obvious to them; meanwhile the rest of us need a little push to see significance and connect the dots. It helps me to try and wear a "military" sort of hat, where you look first for weapons or potential to use as a weapon, then go back and think about how it WAS used as a weapon. Because by the time we find out about anything, it's already been in play for years.
Can someone break this one down? I'm not tracking.
I think, there are cyberattacks that have happened and continue to happen. They get blamed on Russia without reason, then it turns out it’s actually somebody within ‘US’ us. Attacking things and collecting data because they can?
The overall theory I’m seeing is that Q has some very talented data collection teams and they have everything. By everything they mean everything, proof of all the fraud, crimes and illegal activities.
Thanks, I wasn't getting the connection either.
I've tried to follow some decoders as complex as serial brain and others more simple, and also started combining observations about the 8 types of smart - we all have some level of intelligence around logic, words, art, body/movement, music, self, others, nature (patterns).
Those who post the decodes seem to have a great level of logic and pattern recognition, so the conclusions feel obvious to them; meanwhile the rest of us need a little push to see significance and connect the dots. It helps me to try and wear a "military" sort of hat, where you look first for weapons or potential to use as a weapon, then go back and think about how it WAS used as a weapon. Because by the time we find out about anything, it's already been in play for years.