"The United States of America, in its capacity as a prior defendant in this litigation through the U.S. Department of Defense and as an interested party in regard to the protective order entered at ECF No. 253, hereby requests a 30-day extension of time, until October 6, 2022, in which to respond to the motion to intervene and to lift protective order, ECF No. 1216, filed by non-party Michael J. Lindell. Under the Court’s local rules, the response to that motion is currently due September 6, 2022."
Link to 09/01/22 DoJ request to extend time to respond to Lindell motion:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1227.0.pdf
Links to original Montgomery v eTreppid lawsuit (during which DNI/DoD gag order granted under States Secrets doctrine) and recent Lindell motion to lift gag order.
Full Docket / Montgomery vs Trepp 01/31/06 - 08/26/22
Above link contains following documents of current import to Lindell motion:
Memorandom In Support Of Motion To Intervene And To Lift Protective Order
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.0.pdf
Declaration of Michael Lindell
Exhibit A - Dominion vs Lindell Lawsuit
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.1.pdf
Declaration of Dennis Montgomery
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1216.2_2.pdf
Dragging their feet, hope the judge is honest and tells them they have had adequate time to prepare.
me too but often courts are lenient on extensions of this nature especially where it's the moving party (i.e., the plaintiff that initiated the case)
Damn that's big. Based pillow man will not stop.
Is the DOJ trying to drag this past the November elections by asking for an extension?
Trying to delay as long as they can
Octobers gonna be hot.....mad man is gonna do i
At least a couple of folks have tried to warn Mike in the past about the patently fraudulent conman that is Dennis Montgomery, but he will not have it. And he also used Montgomery's deep state reporter fraud, Mary Fanning, for his first election documentary at the end. These folks are no good. The fact that Montgomery is gushed over by many here on this post and others tells me you all haven't seen any of the evidence brought against Dennis on his Hammer and Scorecard claims, including unsigned FBI 302 forms. I hope this doesn't backfire on Mike, but he would be wise to do some listening as well.
Always open to new information.
If possible, please provide sources (links to documentation, not FBI 302s or newspaper articles) for evidence Montgomery is a fraud and conman.
Original sources and their contexts are important in evaluating allegations of this nature.
In the meantime, seems counterproductive on Lindell's part to file a motion to get the States Secret gag order on Montgomery lifted. That would mean Montgomery would no longer be barred from testifying in court and consequently subject to charges of perjury. Lindell has stated he had the PCAP data evaluated three times over by some of the nation's top cyber security experts. It would seem it would be one thing for Montgomery to con Lindell (who is no cyber expert), but what about all the experts Lindell hired to validate PCAP data. Has Montgomery conned them as well?
Not to mention the exposure to potential charges of perjury as a number of these cyber experts have filed declarations in support of motions and cases in several states (three more scheduled to be filed next week TX, SC, AL and possibly LA) and to which the Montgomery data and testimony could be included as soon as the gag order is lifted.
Seems everybody pushing for transparency and a day in court to prove their case using Montgomery as an expert witness is a fraud and a conman and everybody pushing to keep Montgomery from testifying is not. Quite a conundrum, that.
Dominion and ES&S (plaintiffs) recently argued for a prohibition of any current or former employee being allowed to testify for the defense in their slander case against Mike Lindell and MyPillow (defendants). Seeing a pattern develop in these cases of blocking witnesses from testifying.
Hell... even the President of The United States told us that anyone doubting the integrity of the 2020 election was a threat to national security. Must be true because the President of The United States said it on TV.
Like the Halderman Report detailing all the technical vulnerabilities of electronic voting equipment being held hostage by Judge Totenberg (sealed for over a year) in Georgia at the behest of the DoJ, it seems the Government is trying very hard to keep Montgomery testifying in court for as long as possible.
If Montgomery is a fraud and conman, why would the government care if he perjured himself in open court and proved himself a fraud and conman?
Exhibit 1: https://odysee.com/@Crowdsourcethetruth:d/the-intelligence-assessment-with-kevin-2:9
There are a number of others, but this one encapsulates things nicely. Hopefully a direct source fulfills your criteria that you wanted.
August 2019... Its September 2022.
Since 2019, Kirk Wiebe interview re Montgomery in August 2021 at Lindell's Cyber Symposium and Wiebe's name just came up again during the August 2022 Lindell Moment of Truth Summit.
Kirk Wiebe 12/13/13 Frontline Interview (dated but good for setting a baseline on who is Kirk Wiebe.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/united-states-of-secrets/the-frontline-interview-j-kirk-wiebe/
Here is a video Kirk Wiebe at Lindell's Cyber Symposium 12 August 2021 discussing Dennis Montgomery:
https://rumble.com/vlge7p-top-nsa-analyst-exposes-the-truth-behind-the-2020-election-and-more.html
Video description notation:
“William F. Jasper, senior editor for The New American magazine, interviews J. Kirk Wiebe, retired legendary NSA senior intelligence analyst, cyber expert and whistleblower, regarding massive 2020 election fraud at Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, on August 12, 2021."
"Mr. Wiebe discusses the problems with the PCaps (packet captures) data and the likely provenance of the data, as well as background on Dennis Montgomery, the controversial cyber expert who is the likely source of the data."
Wiebe states that he has worked "over the last two years" with Dennis Montgomery on the PCAP capture data. As of the date of this interview, 12 August 2021, Wiebe's interaction with Dennis Montgomery was not in person but working remotely. Doing the math... "over the last two years" would begin Wiebe's interaction with Dennis Montgomery on PCAP validation prior to August 2019 (well predating the 3 Nov 2020 election).
It seems to be about this time that Wiebe stops answering Shipp's calls and ends contact with Shipp.
08/22/22 Mike Lindell's The Moment of Truth Summit, 13 days ago.
Kirk Wiebe's name, along with that of Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, is mentioned in the second declaration that Lindell's attorney, Kurt Olsen, reads: declaration by Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia. What Olsen emphasizes and explains is the partial retraction added to Keshavarz-Nia's declaration dated the day after the original declaration.
https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/9ee747d91ea75c6e273e54e6753dee196c99312531563d7ba818802251fca952.png
Video below 8/22/22 during Lindell Moment of Truth Summit, attorney Kurt Olsen, Mike Lindell, and cyber expert Jeff O'Donnell discuss Dennis Montgomery, validity of his claims and PCAP data.
https://rumble.com/v1gvuef-truth-summit-pcaps-and-dennis-montgomery-8-22-22.html
Mike Lindell, minute/sec 10:53:
"They went Fox on me for 17 days...
Just sayin...
Shipp bio... my take... Shipp's a note taker and a report writer. Just my opinion, take it as such.
https://kevinshipp.com/bio/
https://www.thepowerhour.com/bio/KevinShippBio.pdf
Mike Zullo - police investigator - no technical expertise - from what I have read from Montgomery's court filings and in the Docket documents of the Montgomery v eTreppid case, the FBI co-opts state and local police assets for harassment purposes and rightly or wrongly Montgomery at some point smelled the Feds, or smelled Zullo's intention to involve the Feds (Zullo confirms last in the 2019 video)... which Zullo knew, in advance, was kryptonite for Montgomery. Zullo blew it. Remember 1st rule of Paranoia Club, you're not paranoid if they really are after you.
Initial impression (granted with hindsight of current revelations)... Zullo was in way, way over his head. Playing checkers in the shadow world of high stakes Spy -v- Spy while Montgomery was playing chess.
After you have read the case filings in the Montgomery v eTreppid case (precis in Montgomery Declaration filed with Lindell's 20 August 2022 motion in Nevada to lift the DoJ/DoD gag order on Montgomery), I would be very interested in your analysis, in particular of what occurred during the Seattle timeline of this matter. Pay close attention to the absolutely weird way the case was eventually settled and who walked away with $$$ (follow the lawyers) at the end of the day.
Mike Zullo online dig (cursory):
https://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2015/10/mike-zullo-takes-the-5th/
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/joe-arpaios-investigator-mike-zullo-invokes-5th-7759810
https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/joe-arpaios-cold-case-posse-investigator-mike-zullo-shot-down-by-federal-judge-7805065
https://tesibria.typepad.com/wye/the-mcso-seattle-operation-testimony-mike-zullo-nov-10-2015.html
Link below for Mike Zullo taking The Fifth 224 times. Hardly matters, the questions still get asked.
https://tesibria.typepad.com/wye/the-mcso-seattle-operation-testimony-mike-zullo-nov-12-2015.html
My favorite part of the Zullo testimony was between the attorneys:
Q. Then at 8:46 p.m., Mr. Montgomery tells you about some PDF-related software, is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. And that's on the birth certificate issue?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. And then you write back to him about the plan which you say is going to, quote, "kill two birds with one stone," end quote?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Okay. Did either of those birds have anything to do with Judge Snow?
A. No, sir.
Q. Okay. Why didn't you say that to Mr. Montgomery?
A. I probably was thinking of something to do to try to help him along, to put him back on track to get him to produce something; I don't even remember what that was.
Q. Well, the strong implication of this e-mail string is that at least Mr. Montgomery thought that the data he was working on wouldn't be useful if the contempt charge was resolved.
MR. MASTERSON: Objection, foundation, and counsel's testifying as to Mr. Montgomery's thoughts.
MR. YOUNG: I haven't asked my question yet, Your Honor.
THE COURT: There hasn't been a question. There's no question pending.
https://tesibria.typepad.com/wye/the-mcso-seattle-operation-testimony-mike-zullo-nov-13-2015.html
All in all, a lot of taking the fifth, I don't know, I don't recall, I can't remember, I believe, ect., etc.. Much of Zullo's testimony is speculative at best, evasive at worst. To understand what is being danced around in Zullo's testimony you have to research this matter concerning Blixseth and Montgomery.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Blixseth#Software
and these matter as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Blixseth#Litigation,_bankruptcies_and_defaults
It will provide context and frame Zullo's testimony and statements about Montgomery in a different light. Recommended.
Sharon Rondeau
Link below... excerpt:
"While under subpoena and without legal representation, Zullo chose not to divulge the information Montgomery had alleged about the mega-computer system known as “The Hammer” and Montgomery’s role in its alleged operation, he told The Post & Email in a recent interview. Following his testimony in the civil-contempt matter in November 2015, Zullo began to divulge that Montgomery had presented what he said was evidence of massive, warrantless surveillance on the part of the federal government on American citizens and data breaches victimizing some 150,000 Maricopa County residents."
Sharon Rondeau:
https://www.thepostemail.com/author/sharon-rondeau/
Mrs. Rondeau is a natural born American Citizen who began researching the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama during the 2008 election cycle. She has been operating The Post & Email since April 2010 following Mr. Charlton’s departure. She earned a B.A. from Eastern Connecticut State University in 1986 summa cum laude and worked in the areas of office skills instruction and word processing support for 15 years.
https://www.harpcenter.com/product/5828/connecticut-harp-teachers
https://www.thepostemail.com/2017/06/06/former-nsa-cia-contractor-dennis-montgomery-topic-hannity/
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/07/09/zullo-on-the-hammer-dennis-montgomery-and-changing-narratives-part-2/
Sharon Rondeau / Dennis Montgomery associated:
https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2021/02/further-proof-that-mary-fanning-and-dennis-montgomery-are-lying-about-hammer-by-larry-johnson/comments/
https://www.thepostemail.com/2019/08/19/fake-news-in-the-age-of-the-internet-part-1/
Kinda, sorta, where we are with the Mike Lindell motion to lift the States Secret gag order on Montgomery... isn't it. Finally getting Montgomery and his data into a court room.
Genesis and history of the invocation of States Secret Privilege in U.S. courts...
Supreme Court recognition in United States v. Reynolds
Main article: United States v. Reynolds
The privilege was first officially recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953). A military airplane, a B-29 Superfortress bomber, crashed. The widows of three civilian crew members sought accident reports on the crash but were told that to release such details would threaten national security by revealing the bomber's top-secret mission.[1][2][3][4][5][6][10][11] The court held that only the government can claim or waive the privilege, but that it “is not to be lightly invoked” and that there “must be a formal claim of privilege, lodged by the head of the department which has control over the matter, after actual personal consideration by that officer.”[1] The court stressed that the decision to withhold evidence is to be made by the presiding judge and not the executive.[1]
In 2000, the accident reports were declassified and released, and it was found that the assertion that they contained secret information was fraudulent. The reports did, however, contain information about the poor condition of the aircraft itself, which would have been very compromising to the Air Force's case. Many commentators have alleged government misuse of secrecy in this landmark case.[12]
Despite this ruling, a case might still be subject to judicial review since the privilege was intended to prevent certain, but not all, information to be precluded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege#Supreme_Court_recognition_in_United_States_v._Reynolds
United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition[1] of the state secrets privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds
Marmion: A Tale Of Flodden Field In Six Cantos
Sir Walter Scott
Canto Sixth, Stanza XVII, Lines 532, 533.
"O, what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practice to deceive."
https://archive.org/stream/marmion05077gut/marmn10a.txt
https://qaggregator.news/?q=state+secrets (sort order of drops to 4,6,8,etc..)
Additional links to current background info:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAvDTQCO/mike-lindell-china-originated-pc/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTb69BBc/copy-060517-dennis-montgomery-so/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTfmmEK0/link--mike-lindell-motion-to-lif/
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JTtqnKsw/doj-requests-30-day-extension-to/