PhD Level Red Pill: Tom Cowan Explains That Not Only Do Viruses Not Exist, but PCR Does Not Really Replicate DNA, and DNA is Not Valid, Either ... WOW!

posted 2 years ago by MAG768720 2 years ago by MAG768720 +34 / -0

For those here who want to dig deeper into the lies presented by mainstream (i.e. government-funded) science, these are some pretty damning video presentations.

Forget that PCR is not a valid diagnostic tool (it is not), but it might not even be a valid replication tool, either:

https://rumble.com/v1helnt-everything-you-need-to-know-about-pcr-tests-tom-cowan.html

Digging even deeper, recent findings show that DNA is NOT the same in every cell in the body -- and "Does DNA really exist?" turns out to be a valid question, too. DNA follows the same fake science as PCR and viruses -- NOTHING is taken directly from the human body to be studied, but rather ALL of it is a MIXING of human tissue with chemicals that do not exist in the body -- and then the final product is ASSUMED to have some sort of profound meaning.

https://rumble.com/v1hglvt-genetics-dna-and-rna-webinar-by-tom-cowan-aug.-26-2022.html

In part of that 2nd video, Stefan Lanka explains that 25 geneticists at UC Berkley could not figure out a simple question: "What is a gene?" Their meeting ended in shouting and accusations, and no science. He says that geneticists have disproven their own theories, but have not told virologists or the public.

This would mean that DNA tests, paternity tests, forensic criminal DNA tests, genetic ancestry tests, so-called genetic illnesses ... are ALL suspect as being completely bogus and not scientific in any way.

Mind-blowing stuff.

26 comments

26 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (26)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– The_Watcher 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

ALLEGED discovery of the "double helix"

It was the work of Rosalind Franklin that set the scene for the double helix.

OK, the picture does not directly indicate a double helix but it works like the double slit experiment where you get a picture on the screen which is the Fourier Transform of the slits. In the case of DNA you get a Fourier transform of a double helix.

Watson and Crick used that information to construct a model of the actual molecule. They got it badly wrong the first time and needed a second attempt.

Sadly, Franklin was not eligible for a Nobel Prize because she died before it could be awarded.

permalink parent save report block reply

– Morpheus11 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I've heard this version of the story as well. I've been sifting through some old saved videos to see where that story of the artist friend came from. Thanks for your comment!