My guess about the two suns is it refers to Arthur C Clake's "2010" novel, which involves the forming of a second sun. Clarke was a high ranking Freemason.
Electric universe theory maintains we had two suns at one point. Saturn is a burned out brown dwarf star and was our sun before [events]. Our current sun isn't our original. Ancient sun worshipers = Saturn [satan] worshipers.
Wallace thornhill provides a little better context for the Saturn Hypothesis. The idea is that earth Venus and Mars formed in a Z-pinch with Saturn. Saturn essentially “switched off” due to coming into contact with the Sun’s electric field. Anodes and Cathodes; incredibly simple.
Yes, I love Wall. He needs to be on Rogan to get the EU model out to the masses. The sun is not a nuclear furnace, it's electrically powered from the universe by Birkland currents. The EU was an amazing red pill for me.
Yes and the astronomy community is still struggling to run interference on the Webb telescope’s revelations that red shift isn’t proof of a “Big Bang”. That was pretty damn eye opening.
It's my understanding that suns (stars) are powered by nuclear Fusion, not electricity. So I am a tad confused about anodes and cathodes being involved.
As it relates to Saturn being a former sun, I find that improbable as well, because nuclear Fusion doesn't just shut down and turn back into an inert gas ball the size of a planet. I could be wrong on that though, I often am.
One thing I think I know is that when the nuclear Fusion process reaches Iron (Fe, #26), this is the point at which gravity overpowers nuclear Fusion and a star explodes in a supernova.
The supernova explosion is what creates all natural elements higher than 26. Many of these elements are within each of us, which means we are all made of former stars.
So next time you look at the stars, you can take wonder that a little part of them makes up a big part of you.
The sun being a fusion reactor is completely unsubstantiated. In fact, it's absurd. The corona is millions of degrees, but the core is only thousands. There's plenty of science to support the anode/cathode idea. See above.
There's a lot of scientific literature to go over that has been demonized for over a hundred years on the subject.
My guess about the two suns is it refers to Arthur C Clake's "2010" novel, which involves the forming of a second sun. Clarke was a high ranking Freemason.
Electric universe theory maintains we had two suns at one point. Saturn is a burned out brown dwarf star and was our sun before [events]. Our current sun isn't our original. Ancient sun worshipers = Saturn [satan] worshipers.
Wallace thornhill provides a little better context for the Saturn Hypothesis. The idea is that earth Venus and Mars formed in a Z-pinch with Saturn. Saturn essentially “switched off” due to coming into contact with the Sun’s electric field. Anodes and Cathodes; incredibly simple.
Yes, I love Wall. He needs to be on Rogan to get the EU model out to the masses. The sun is not a nuclear furnace, it's electrically powered from the universe by Birkland currents. The EU was an amazing red pill for me.
Yes and the astronomy community is still struggling to run interference on the Webb telescope’s revelations that red shift isn’t proof of a “Big Bang”. That was pretty damn eye opening.
It's my understanding that suns (stars) are powered by nuclear Fusion, not electricity. So I am a tad confused about anodes and cathodes being involved.
As it relates to Saturn being a former sun, I find that improbable as well, because nuclear Fusion doesn't just shut down and turn back into an inert gas ball the size of a planet. I could be wrong on that though, I often am.
One thing I think I know is that when the nuclear Fusion process reaches Iron (Fe, #26), this is the point at which gravity overpowers nuclear Fusion and a star explodes in a supernova.
The supernova explosion is what creates all natural elements higher than 26. Many of these elements are within each of us, which means we are all made of former stars.
So next time you look at the stars, you can take wonder that a little part of them makes up a big part of you.
So we have that going for us. Which is nice.
https://www.youtube.com/user/ThunderboltsProject
The sun being a fusion reactor is completely unsubstantiated. In fact, it's absurd. The corona is millions of degrees, but the core is only thousands. There's plenty of science to support the anode/cathode idea. See above.
There's a lot of scientific literature to go over that has been demonized for over a hundred years on the subject.
And very interesting context, thanks!!