Boris Johnson giving live speech on TV just referred to The Queen as "The Keystone"
(media.greatawakening.win)
What is the KEYSTONE?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
IMO, you're 100% right, there.
Lemme tell you about my journey with the 'strawman'.
Around 5 or 6 years ago, i first came across the notions of: govts & corporations & our govt being a corporation. Then, stuff like common law courts. Then, other talk about strawman. My first thoughts about all that stuff was, this seems like a bit of nonsense. It doesn't make sense. (And, I have a very strong tendency to doubt first when the data and the reasonings don't coalesce in my logic brain, etc.)
It's come in via dribs and drabs. A bit of info here, and bit there. "No, I don't stand under you (understand you)". Etc. Then, admiralty law, law of the sea, law of the land, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
To be honest, the capitals stuff seems like fluff and disinfo to me (at this point). Some of the info out there is disinfo injected by black propaganda in order to confuse, mislead, and misdirect people from the real content = my conjecture at this point.
But, over the last 6 or so years, the data has slowly (very slowly, and not with a dedicated focus, but just by encountering and then taking a deeper look at some of the stuff, but no real deep dives), slowly started to fall into place.
Most recently, a LOT of the stuff was brought together in these two videos I watched last week.
I'll link them here, in case you are interested, but my experience over the last 5 years (and I'm still working on this) is that this ONLY makes sense when you put lots of little lower-level pieces into place, step by step, and then build on that, and build on that, and get more of an idea about the next level, then the next level, then the next level.
Tackle a higher level (i.e hear someone talking about yoru govt being a corporation and you you not really being you but being controlled via admiralty law, for example) and it doesn't make sense, really. Because you're missing pieces of the lower levels.
Anyway, that's my experience, as best as I can describe at this point.
Not sure if these are where you are at yet, but they made UBER sense to me, this last week.
Clif High - talks about the law
https://www.bitchute.com/video/nTuQoDQt23hf/
SGT report : Discussion with Dr. KL
https://www.bitchute.com/video/c04ffAiftyS0/
*disclaimer: I'm not endorsing everything Clif High says. Also, I tend to think that experts in these fields don't know everything, but there are many pieces of the puzzle, some key ones that some experts do know.
Clif high puts all the blam on the kazarians...to me that is wrong...it's the Vatican that control everything..they havecownedce gland and Ireland since king Richard gave them to pope innocent in 1500s. Pope tore up magna carta
Francesleader.com substack goes into all this in mystery Babylon. The royal family are not the crown. Crown temple..inner London owns America etc and the pope owns temple bar
Remember Washington DC the Vatican and inner London separate states not under the laws of the lsnds they are in.
Clif not keen to share these truths is he?
Yeah... nah. I think you're either listening to too little clif or making judgments based on scant info.
I'm very confident that in CLif's view, the Khazarians are BEHIND the Vatican, and BEHIND the central banks, and the powers in London, etc.
Ys no doubt about it the kazarians are in it but Clif never mentioned the vstic owns America that I recall or about crown temple being granted letters of patent etc
I guess you're typing on a phone?
Criticizing someone because they didn't mention something you are focused on seems a little bit .... backwards ... to me.
Maybe focus on what he is saying, instead of what he isn't?
I mean, there are things YOU aren't saying that might also be relevant. So, should I dismiss what you ARE saying therefore?
I don't think so.
Cheers, anyway.