Boris Johnson giving live speech on TV just referred to The Queen as "The Keystone"
(media.greatawakening.win)
What is the KEYSTONE?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
I guess you're typing on a phone?
Criticizing someone because they didn't mention something you are focused on seems a little bit .... backwards ... to me.
Maybe focus on what he is saying, instead of what he isn't?
I mean, there are things YOU aren't saying that might also be relevant. So, should I dismiss what you ARE saying therefore?
I don't think so.
Cheers, anyway.
Cmon....forgetting to mention the declaration of independence is a worthless piece of paper signed by five crown temple members...that the pope owns England and Ireland and has since 1500s that the colonies North America and all the central banks in the G7 and WHO IMF bank of int.settlements etc has to be deliberate....you can't just forget it!!!!
That the Vatican runs the world isn't something you forget to mention!!! It's not schwab he should keep banging on about is it?
He gives very detailed explanations so I don't buy that for a second.
The question is to me why? Why did he decide to keep that from us? Was it his own idea? Or is he working for someone who wanted it hidden?
No one has the right to decide what truths not to tell when they are professing to be truthful and trustworthy....
I guess YOU get to decide? Sounds like you think you do. Let's just say, I view things differently.
I've come across this argument several times here in the last two days.
"N person is NOT saying X, therefore, they are dishonest and untrustworthy"
Whether the people asserting this know this or not, this is basically a Communist way of thinking.
"This man did NOT denounce the capitalists! He is therefore guilty of being an anti-revolutionary! Execute him!"
Dumbest rationale in the world, in my opinion. Just another (mental) version of wokism.
Donald Trump, do you denounce the evil white supremacist activists in (that) rioti, the other day? No? Oh, I see. So YOU are an evil white supremacist too. Now we know.
Sheeesh.
I tell the truth as I know it...not holding anything back ....I don't have an agenda except to share the truth as I discover it.
Cliff has an agenda . As I said to go banging on about Klaus and the kazarians and never mention. Oh by the way it's the pope that runs Klaus the G7 EVERYTHING isn't an oversight...it's deliberate withholding of essential truths
...he actually lied about who was in control...
I pointed out to him in an email that him talking about viruses being contagious when I had written him all information that they were not meant I couldn't trust a word he says...his reply? Fuck you
Can't stand these "truthtellers" who control their telegram accounts so no one finds out truths they don't want known.
So, to be a bit contrary here, where is your telegram account, and where are your videos that we can watch to find out what you know?
I mean, kek. You write a man and tell him that you cannot trust a word he says and he replies "fuck you" and you are, what, surprised by that?
And how is someone choosing to focus on and share their particular views on a topic somehow supposed to ..."control their ... account ... so that no one finds out truths ....."? I mean, you're basically asserting that the man is a DS agent, and is being deliberately deceptive. But, I mean, what is stopping you, or anyone else, going to other sources to get the information (you think) they need?
Anyway, you've got your views, to which you're entitled. Myself, I don't find anything in what you've written that inspires me to consider your view as being anything other than a rather negatively focused outlook.
I was thinking about your viewpoint this afternoon. So here are some key points that I personally consider to be key, critical factors when I engage or develop views on people sharing their views (truth?):
Understanding of "the truth" is a spectrum on which all people exist, from very little to a lot, but no one knows nothing and no one knows everything.
People do not need to be perfect in their perspectives in order to share something of value.
Intention and purpose are invisible, subjective factors, but can essentially be categorized into either more egoically driven (emotionally over-charged, self-identified, self-serving or programming-driven) or more awareness driven (highly reflective of self, humbler, unassuming, open and intention to serve the whole or a purpose higher than one's self).
Motivation and intention (whether conscious or unconscious) are a more key and central factor than information and data. Good data can be used for the wrong reasons, and bad data can be shared in ignorance but for the right reasons.
The dividing point in our society and world centers on No. 3 above. But like understanding (1.), the range here is a spectrum on which more or less weight leans one way or the other. Nonetheless, despite being a spectrum, location on that spectrum defines real value in the world.
Me? I'm OK with Clif High. Based on the 4 factors above, I'm OK with Clif.
If you're pissed off with someone, and you 'cant stand' someone, then you might want to ask, why internal programming is driving you to respond and react in this way. Why are your emotions engaged here? Is that engagement helpful or unhelpful?
Anyway, seems pretty darn clear to me that there is more here than just your 'not having an agenda except to share the truth'. But each to his own.
Cheers.