Yeah, it was totally an Airplane... For sure.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (104)
sorted by:
I honestly think they really did crash at least one plane into the towers but pre-planted explosives were used to finish the job. The crash was cover for the explosives.
Did you not see the building buckle at the impact? Do you think they planted explosives right in the impact area or is it more likely the impact and fire compromised the structure enough for it to fold over? Do you think the floors below would withstand the floors above collapsing in on them? Focus on who got the damn hijackers their passports and stop hyping the obvious smoke screen.
So it fell nearly perfectly (not folding over) at freefall speed. Maybe the lower floors would buckle, sure, but at freefall speed it means they're offering zero resistance.
What the fuck does this look like to you?
https://imgur.com/a/CxjxUmN
What is "freefall speed?" What speed should a 110 story building collapse at? How much resistance should 90+ floors offer 10 floors above falling over on them? That 10 floors is a giant ass wrecking ball.
Freefall speed is the speed it would take gravity alone to bring something to the ground.
Any amount of resistance should make a fall a little slower than that.
I disagree. The plane and all that fuel would have a high chance of fucking up all the precision wiring and detonators. But we don't have to agree on every detail fren!
Just so we are clear... you acknowledge that a fully fueled plane slamming into a building full of explosives could cause a major problem with pre-planted explosives going off as intended.... correct?
Hmmm that’s actually a really good counterpoint.