The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
Absolutely Not...They were the Strongest buildings ever built that had a solid steel internal frame and a Secondary solid metal frame on the outside...Its impossible for the floors to "Collapse" into each other at that speed...Never...Go watch some Videos on Buildings that have collapsed/ pancake style like they like to refer to the WTC collapse as..."Pancaking"
Yeah to fall directly straight down, NOT. How does the weak side where the plane entered fall at exactly the same time as the other side that wasn’t penetrated? It wasn’t a through and through shot like a bullet.
Was that you mentioning the penny?
I think that plane went a ways in, don't you? Did it hit the building and then just drop down to the street?
It was a HUGE explosion. Over 40,000 gallons of fuel!
I see the floors of the building like a line of dominoes.
This is the nosecone of a plane being hit by a single BIRD...And you want to tell me these planes penetrated an outer skeleton of the building made of steel with reinforced concrete...???? Yeah OK....
No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
And they were the first buildings in history to fully collapse because of a fire...
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
Absolutely Not...They were the Strongest buildings ever built that had a solid steel internal frame and a Secondary solid metal frame on the outside...Its impossible for the floors to "Collapse" into each other at that speed...Never...Go watch some Videos on Buildings that have collapsed/ pancake style like they like to refer to the WTC collapse as..."Pancaking"
The plane and the fuel WAS the explosive!
Yeah to fall directly straight down, NOT. How does the weak side where the plane entered fall at exactly the same time as the other side that wasn’t penetrated? It wasn’t a through and through shot like a bullet.
Was that you mentioning the penny? I think that plane went a ways in, don't you? Did it hit the building and then just drop down to the street? It was a HUGE explosion. Over 40,000 gallons of fuel! I see the floors of the building like a line of dominoes.
This is the nosecone of a plane being hit by a single BIRD...And you want to tell me these planes penetrated an outer skeleton of the building made of steel with reinforced concrete...???? Yeah OK....
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4543186/bird-strike-boeing-737-sudan/
https://gizmodo.com/bird-strike-does-disturbing-damage-to-the-nose-of-a-737-1703062851
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pictures+of+a+planes+nosecone+after+being+hit+by+birds&atb=v314-1&iax=images&ia=images
Building WTC 7 dude? Love your thoughts on that.
WTC7 had to come down, it saw too much!
No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
You may as well be promoting a flat Earth.
So now the guy who fueled the planes were in on the conspiracy too!