No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
No, I don't. The building didn't all of a sudden add weight just because some beams were weakened. The notion that every single beam/column, floor by floor, was compromised at exactly the same rate, uniformly, as all 100+ floors collapsed is preposterous, on its face. Yet, that's what you see occurring as the towers implode. Yes, implode.
The fuel would have exploded on impact (if there really was any), and it's simply not possible for an aluminum airframe to penetrate steel, and emerge on the opposite side with nosecone intact. Beyond laughable.
You may as well be promoting a flat Earth.
So now the guy who fueled the planes were in on the conspiracy too!