The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
The government’s official explanation is that the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued created a pancake collapse.
NIST “found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to September 11, 2001.”
Just the weight of the upper floors would be enough to collapse the building, don't you think? That was a lot of weight coming down. And the fires didn't help the situation. Those planes hold a HUGE amount of fuel and the plane itself was very heavy.
Building WTC 7 dude? Love your thoughts on that.
WTC7 had to come down, it saw too much!