I've seen a number of articles posted here that a day or two later show up as headlines on Gateway Pundit. I'm not slamming GP, but rather just noting what a good job the GAW pedes do at finding significant material before it goes mainstream.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Imo, GWP is a grift outlet, always has been (it's kinda in the name lol) They also write just like other MSM articles. I've noticed they source a lot of their material from American thinker and what I would consider other independent writers, so it's more of monetized reposting in a way I guess. They are the internet version of Newsmax.. hell Newsmax makes a better impression than them. Just the news is much more authentic imo.
I'm just simply not reading anything that has to use BOMBSHELL and cliquey catch lines in their title every other article. It's not genuine and it's not honest. If you are a loyalist to TGP that's a personal decision but you're missing out on the critical context over "political opinion". That's what a pundit is by definition.
"TGP is the ONLY one besides here and TS I check daily."
I would consider that loyalist. What is insulting about that? Did not mean so. I'm a loyalist to GAW definitely. I really appreciate the community and I defend criticism of it, regardless of some of the negative interactions that occur. Dan Bongino was in very close connection with John solomon. It was them two that did the best at reporting about crossfire hurricane, the biggest issue in our nation's history imo, so that's why I said justthenews. No harm meant. I just don't want people to stick with few resources for research.
Justthenews makes up half of its crap.
John Solomon makes up shit? You're going to have to provide proof for that bold statement.
Ah, you're right. I was thinking RealRawNews. My bad.
I've gotten some pretty good sources from Just The News but I've gotten far more sources from Gateway Pundit.
What a stupid thing to argue about, just do your due diligence if you don't trust them but they are right about a lot of things that aren't talked about.
They will also occasionally get things wrong but they've become much more professional these last 2 years and I'm seeing errors a lot less than when I first started reading either outlet.
And the other half is pure fiction.