What does any of that have to do with precession. The answer is 0. Describe how precession works and exists in your flat earth world. Spent alot of time rambling about bitcoin and some theoretical challenge. Could have easily answered how precession works on your flat earth. Explain. I want to be enlightened, told facts so I can wake up out of my sleepy chromatic round earth reality. If you actually try to, then we can get to the harder more adult conversations of other phenomena you can mostly easily explain as well.
You're making an ASSUMPTION dtxman75. Can you guess what it is?
How do you know there are "rotating bodies" zillions, kajillions and bajillions of miles away from you?
Here's how I explain "precession". There are no "rotating bodies" up yonder in them thar "space".
NASA's produced some lovely CGI and artistic renderings that say otherwise I realize. They also faked the "moon landings" and have produced nothing but fake pictures and videos of earth since the infamous blue marble in 1972. NASA is also an alphabet agency of our honesty and trustworthy government, like the CIA, FBI, NSA, FDA, CDC, NIH, etc. As they say, birds of a feather....
Here are some facts:
Many scientific measurements can be taken by the average person today proving the 6 continents (not 7) and 3 oceans all exist on a plane with no curvature. There are zero scientific measurements that can be done demonstrating curvature or a globe.
The moon isn't a "rock" floating in a "void", suspended by an unproven, theoretical force called "gravity" (electrostatics explains what goes up must come down). This is why you can only ever see one "face" of the moon. Because it's not a rotating rock. And it's not 225K miles away. If it were, the so-called astronauts would have been blinded by it. We estimate the moon (and sun) are roughly 3000-4000 miles away.
The sun isn't a giant furnace of hydrogen gas defying all known laws of physics (containment/dispersal of gas in a vacuum). And it isn't 93 million miles away either. It's the same size (~32 miles in circumference) and distance away as the moon. Just as your eyeballs and common sense register this simple reality.
There's an answer for every one of your questions. But you have to be willing to accept the possibility that you've been lied to your whole life about "space". And that appears to be the hardest thing for most people to accept. "What if we've been lied to about space, sun, moon, planets, starts, etc.".
So your next question should be, well if those lights in the sky aren't "rotating bodies", than what else could they be? And how far away are they really? Check out the inverse square law of light and do some simple math. Could you really see something billions or trillions of miles away?
And here's another fun question to investigate. Does light really have a speed? Has anybody been able to measure it? If not, why not? Could it be just another theory, like gravity, big bang, special relativity, etc.?
The lies about "space" are legion. It's nothing like we've been taught, that much we can confidently say today. We don't have all the answers either. They have been well hidden from us for centuries. But if we had NASA's $53Million a day money-laundering budget, we could provide many more answers than we currently have today.
Bottom line, people who have researched flat earth aren't crazy forum-sliders. They are people who have taken the time to realize how much we've been lied to. And there are so many lies it's hard to keep up with them all. It's no different than all the political and cultural lies we find ourselves enmeshed in. The people who control this world don't want us to have even a whiff of truth and they're counting on their indoctrination STICKING to the hive mind, indoctrination that began in kindergarten BTW, with that giant globe in your first classroom, which is a mandatory "teaching tool" across the western world for a reason....
I made no assumptions. I asked about precession and has nothing to do with rotating bodies in space. Precession is a specific arc degree deviation from the circumferential rotation on an axial, tilted, plane. Its been used with alignments to celestial bodies for 1000s of years with reverse location hemispherically on earth by time. Additionally allows triangulation after the location/time value is known. There is no way to align a structure or any object to North and magnetic north by longitude and latitude without this input as a known value.
The use of the inverse square law as your example is also innacurate method of measurement because it is not a measurement, it's a calculation and it excludes the , medium, that light travels through.
I can appreciate the long reply, however the rest of your response simply posits questions that are loaded and leading and do not address anything involving precession which was, again, what I asked a flat earther to explain, describe etc. As expected the responses have all been deflection and or it doesn't exist and is a lie.
Btw scientific does not apply to measurements. Scientific is a method. Measurement is a action in Units. It does not apply to a type of measurement. As an example, the inverse square law is not a scientific measurement, it is a formula/equation to calculate the desired factors input into the variables along with the constants to equate a value. It also does not calculate "visibility"
Precession has nothing to do with rotating bodies"
Well if this is so, you should sign up to edit Wikipedia's page on precession as the people who manage that page have no idea what they're talking about apparently.
"Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself. In other words, if the axis of rotation of a body is itself rotating about a second axis, that body is said to be precessing about the second axis. A motion in which the second Euler angle changes is called nutation. In physics, there are two types of precession: torque-free and torque-induced.
In astronomy, precession refers to any of several slow changes in an astronomical body's rotational or orbital {sic - which implies rotating planets/stars} parameters. An important example is the steady change in the orientation of the axis of rotation of the Earth, known as the precession of the equinoxes."
I'm telling you what you see in the sky, and what you CLEARLY SAW in the sky before you entered into our government indoctrination and brainwashing camps (school) is PRECISELY what is up in the sky ---->>>> LIGHTS not "Bodies".
I'm suggesting that there are no kajillion ton rocks magically floating in the sky. Gravity is an unproven theory and always will be as it does not exist. You cannot bend/warp No-thing-ness, aka "The fabric of space-time" --- "Space" and "Time" are not "things" and therefore there is nothing to bend/warp in the first place. Dark matter & dark energy were made up to explain away the mathematical inconsistencies astronomers were beginning to calculate in the middle of the 20th century.
There is no proof of floating rocks. There is no proof of rotating rocks. There is no proof of gravity. There is no proof of special relativity. There is no proof of quantum mechanics. There is no proof of quantum superposition. There is no proof of atoms. There is no proof of electrons/neutrons/protons. There is no proof of photons. There is no proof that light has a "speed". All of this is hypothesis, speculation and theory brought to you by a cabal who doesn't want you to understand who you are, where you are and why you are here.
I've come to the realization that there are people who do want to contemplate and investigate these things and those who don't. And there's no in between. And the latter group greatly outnumbers the former. That's where we're at and that's the way it is.
No hard feelings. I understand I'm in a very small minority at this stage. It's been that way my whole life. For whatever reason I see through BS like nobody else I know. That's how I'm wired.
What does any of that have to do with precession. The answer is 0. Describe how precession works and exists in your flat earth world. Spent alot of time rambling about bitcoin and some theoretical challenge. Could have easily answered how precession works on your flat earth. Explain. I want to be enlightened, told facts so I can wake up out of my sleepy chromatic round earth reality. If you actually try to, then we can get to the harder more adult conversations of other phenomena you can mostly easily explain as well.
You're making an ASSUMPTION dtxman75. Can you guess what it is?
How do you know there are "rotating bodies" zillions, kajillions and bajillions of miles away from you?
Here's how I explain "precession". There are no "rotating bodies" up yonder in them thar "space".
NASA's produced some lovely CGI and artistic renderings that say otherwise I realize. They also faked the "moon landings" and have produced nothing but fake pictures and videos of earth since the infamous blue marble in 1972. NASA is also an alphabet agency of our honesty and trustworthy government, like the CIA, FBI, NSA, FDA, CDC, NIH, etc. As they say, birds of a feather....
Here are some facts:
Many scientific measurements can be taken by the average person today proving the 6 continents (not 7) and 3 oceans all exist on a plane with no curvature. There are zero scientific measurements that can be done demonstrating curvature or a globe.
The moon isn't a "rock" floating in a "void", suspended by an unproven, theoretical force called "gravity" (electrostatics explains what goes up must come down). This is why you can only ever see one "face" of the moon. Because it's not a rotating rock. And it's not 225K miles away. If it were, the so-called astronauts would have been blinded by it. We estimate the moon (and sun) are roughly 3000-4000 miles away.
The sun isn't a giant furnace of hydrogen gas defying all known laws of physics (containment/dispersal of gas in a vacuum). And it isn't 93 million miles away either. It's the same size (~32 miles in circumference) and distance away as the moon. Just as your eyeballs and common sense register this simple reality.
There's an answer for every one of your questions. But you have to be willing to accept the possibility that you've been lied to your whole life about "space". And that appears to be the hardest thing for most people to accept. "What if we've been lied to about space, sun, moon, planets, starts, etc.".
So your next question should be, well if those lights in the sky aren't "rotating bodies", than what else could they be? And how far away are they really? Check out the inverse square law of light and do some simple math. Could you really see something billions or trillions of miles away?
And here's another fun question to investigate. Does light really have a speed? Has anybody been able to measure it? If not, why not? Could it be just another theory, like gravity, big bang, special relativity, etc.?
The lies about "space" are legion. It's nothing like we've been taught, that much we can confidently say today. We don't have all the answers either. They have been well hidden from us for centuries. But if we had NASA's $53Million a day money-laundering budget, we could provide many more answers than we currently have today.
Bottom line, people who have researched flat earth aren't crazy forum-sliders. They are people who have taken the time to realize how much we've been lied to. And there are so many lies it's hard to keep up with them all. It's no different than all the political and cultural lies we find ourselves enmeshed in. The people who control this world don't want us to have even a whiff of truth and they're counting on their indoctrination STICKING to the hive mind, indoctrination that began in kindergarten BTW, with that giant globe in your first classroom, which is a mandatory "teaching tool" across the western world for a reason....
I made no assumptions. I asked about precession and has nothing to do with rotating bodies in space. Precession is a specific arc degree deviation from the circumferential rotation on an axial, tilted, plane. Its been used with alignments to celestial bodies for 1000s of years with reverse location hemispherically on earth by time. Additionally allows triangulation after the location/time value is known. There is no way to align a structure or any object to North and magnetic north by longitude and latitude without this input as a known value. The use of the inverse square law as your example is also innacurate method of measurement because it is not a measurement, it's a calculation and it excludes the , medium, that light travels through.
I can appreciate the long reply, however the rest of your response simply posits questions that are loaded and leading and do not address anything involving precession which was, again, what I asked a flat earther to explain, describe etc. As expected the responses have all been deflection and or it doesn't exist and is a lie.
Btw scientific does not apply to measurements. Scientific is a method. Measurement is a action in Units. It does not apply to a type of measurement. As an example, the inverse square law is not a scientific measurement, it is a formula/equation to calculate the desired factors input into the variables along with the constants to equate a value. It also does not calculate "visibility"
Well if this is so, you should sign up to edit Wikipedia's page on precession as the people who manage that page have no idea what they're talking about apparently.
"Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself. In other words, if the axis of rotation of a body is itself rotating about a second axis, that body is said to be precessing about the second axis. A motion in which the second Euler angle changes is called nutation. In physics, there are two types of precession: torque-free and torque-induced.
In astronomy, precession refers to any of several slow changes in an astronomical body's rotational or orbital {sic - which implies rotating planets/stars} parameters. An important example is the steady change in the orientation of the axis of rotation of the Earth, known as the precession of the equinoxes."
I'm telling you what you see in the sky, and what you CLEARLY SAW in the sky before you entered into our government indoctrination and brainwashing camps (school) is PRECISELY what is up in the sky ---->>>> LIGHTS not "Bodies".
I'm suggesting that there are no kajillion ton rocks magically floating in the sky. Gravity is an unproven theory and always will be as it does not exist. You cannot bend/warp No-thing-ness, aka "The fabric of space-time" --- "Space" and "Time" are not "things" and therefore there is nothing to bend/warp in the first place. Dark matter & dark energy were made up to explain away the mathematical inconsistencies astronomers were beginning to calculate in the middle of the 20th century.
There is no proof of floating rocks. There is no proof of rotating rocks. There is no proof of gravity. There is no proof of special relativity. There is no proof of quantum mechanics. There is no proof of quantum superposition. There is no proof of atoms. There is no proof of electrons/neutrons/protons. There is no proof of photons. There is no proof that light has a "speed". All of this is hypothesis, speculation and theory brought to you by a cabal who doesn't want you to understand who you are, where you are and why you are here.
I've come to the realization that there are people who do want to contemplate and investigate these things and those who don't. And there's no in between. And the latter group greatly outnumbers the former. That's where we're at and that's the way it is.
No hard feelings. I understand I'm in a very small minority at this stage. It's been that way my whole life. For whatever reason I see through BS like nobody else I know. That's how I'm wired.
The dude you replied to is probably an AI bot, try and see if you can fish for its IP address
You could be right. Would explain the disconnected ramblings but written in a way to have some plausible Intellect associated content as well.