I'm curious what you think happened to cause the collapse of the tower (I wanted to hear the conclusion of someone who sounds sensible)
I guess the official story is jet fuel burning in the center core? But the ul whistleblower said that the steel was rated for a much longer time in those conditions?
There was molten steel pouring out the side of one of the Towers like a water fountain. No question. Glowing bright orange, liquid steel. No amount of Kerosene can do that to steel.
There were detonation charges blasting off right beneath the crumple point as the building collapsed in on itself at the exact same speed at which controlled demolitions occur. Eyewitnesses on the ground testify to hearing bombs and seeing no planes until they were told the news said there were planes. The popular narrative says that the passport was found in the rubble for one of the supposed terrorist who flew the plane, but no plane parts were found. Huh...interesting.
One has to deny a lot of established facts to claim that only planes brought the Towers down.
Didnt really answer my question. Was simply pointing out there are 2 different fuels in discussion. I then asked if they knew which burned hotter because I dont. I dont know much about either actually. I do know that it doesnt melt steel the way the powers that be told us
Jet fuel = kerosene
Kerosene cannot burn hot enough to melt steel.
neither can office fires fueled by paper, carpet, wood, etc.
Which is what was going on there.
If kerosene melted steel we've got some space heaters that should have collapsed into their footprint by now.
2500 degrees is not hot enough to melt steel?
2500 degrees is the temperature at which steel begins to melt. But kerosene, when not manipulated in a lab, burns, at best, 1800 degrees.
Not enough to melt steel.
A reduction in tensile strength is all that is needed, not molten metal.
It's comments like this that made me believe the narrative.
It's comments like this that came from Rosie Odonell immediately after 9-11 (although she phrased it like a 5 year old retard)
I'm curious what you think happened to cause the collapse of the tower (I wanted to hear the conclusion of someone who sounds sensible)
I guess the official story is jet fuel burning in the center core? But the ul whistleblower said that the steel was rated for a much longer time in those conditions?
There was molten steel pouring out the side of one of the Towers like a water fountain. No question. Glowing bright orange, liquid steel. No amount of Kerosene can do that to steel.
There were detonation charges blasting off right beneath the crumple point as the building collapsed in on itself at the exact same speed at which controlled demolitions occur. Eyewitnesses on the ground testify to hearing bombs and seeing no planes until they were told the news said there were planes. The popular narrative says that the passport was found in the rubble for one of the supposed terrorist who flew the plane, but no plane parts were found. Huh...interesting.
One has to deny a lot of established facts to claim that only planes brought the Towers down.
So you KNOW that the planes were using kerosene?
Didnt really answer my question. Was simply pointing out there are 2 different fuels in discussion. I then asked if they knew which burned hotter because I dont. I dont know much about either actually. I do know that it doesnt melt steel the way the powers that be told us