thats what I keep asking myself. I actually do understand astronomy. I understand orbital mechanics and physics and quantum physics. How could all of these things work so perfectly within our current model if theyre wrong?
I think Michio Kaku might have given us a hint when he commented that what surprised him the most, is that the parallels in the texts of the Zohar and Kaballah and physics are astounding.
I also believe there is a quote from Einstein somewhere that "it matters not if you consider the earth to be moving through the universe at break neck speed or if the earth is standing still and everything in the universe revolves around it- with the calculations for relativity working either way." Of course thats my paraphrased understanding of what was said. What this means is that you cannot prove the earth is moving through observation, and it merely becomes a debate on philosophical grounds.
Here's my current line of thinking- would it be possible for a superior intelligence to devise a model of physics that functions for 99.999% of observation, but is still flawed in such a way as to obscure the truth? What do Jews say about their supposed superior intelligence? Who gave us general relativity? Why does the surname Stein seem to be connected to so many of our current worldly problems?
you argument is taking a demonstrably fabricated history and using it as some sort of proof of a moving North Star. you have 0 physical evidence of it having ever moved. and then you use NASA, an organization made up of freemasons and nazis as evidence that it will be moving in the future too. we just need to wait 13000 years kek.
and you call me arrogant. perhaps you need a mirror.
Prove that history has been fabricated. Every argument for this that I’ve heard so far assumes it’s own premise. No, you may not invoke Freemasons (not without evidence). No, you may not call me uneducated or deluded just because I don’t buy your story.
I did not say anything about the North Star changing, that was someone else in this thread. Though his theory is plausible since Earth’s axis precesses over time.
“NASA, an organization of Freemasons and Nazis”
Just because an organization is partially made up of such people does not mean their statements are wrong. This is an inverse of the appeal to authority fallacy. A theory’s plausibility is independent of its source.
No flat earther has ever demonstrated what said Freemasons gain by lying about the shape of the earth. Round earth does not disprove God, creation, or the Bible.
Round earth advocates gladly publish all their findings and evidence for the public to check out. People who aren’t Freemasons or Nazis have double checked the work and it all checks out. Kind of hard to lie to people when your research is open source.
watch that and then reevaluate what you think you know about the world. If they can make you believe a fake reality about events as recent as 100 years ago, imagine what they'll make you believe about stuff from thousands of years ago.
1- the organization is not just made up of these types of people, it was founded by them. They are the progenitors. Its akin to trusting the mafia because they inducted some regular citizens.
2- We dont have to demonstrate the pros and cons of their agenda of lies. what good would that do anybody? it would be a waste of time. Your repeated mention of it right now is a waste of time. The WHY holds no importance.
3- Round earth advocates to this day, are unable to demonstrate any sort of curvature of the earths surface, other than through photos from NASA; an organization started by Nazi scientists and Freemasonic cult followers. Do you see why I dont trust them? Would you use a Nigerian prince as your source of proof for how big that check you want me to cash for you is? Similarly, the motion of earth has never been demonstrated by anyone (because it cant be). So the "Trust the science!" crowd can publish all the findings they want. And more "Trust the science!" people can go ahead and confirm their findings. Just like they did with the covid vaccine. None of those people have been or will be going to space.
be careful about what you believe from our fabricated history lol. "Ancient knowledge" kek
Then why does it all add up if you actually understand astronomy?
thats what I keep asking myself. I actually do understand astronomy. I understand orbital mechanics and physics and quantum physics. How could all of these things work so perfectly within our current model if theyre wrong?
I think Michio Kaku might have given us a hint when he commented that what surprised him the most, is that the parallels in the texts of the Zohar and Kaballah and physics are astounding.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PhilosophyofScience/comments/2be7wm/kabbalah_physics_is_there_anything_to_it/
I also believe there is a quote from Einstein somewhere that "it matters not if you consider the earth to be moving through the universe at break neck speed or if the earth is standing still and everything in the universe revolves around it- with the calculations for relativity working either way." Of course thats my paraphrased understanding of what was said. What this means is that you cannot prove the earth is moving through observation, and it merely becomes a debate on philosophical grounds.
Here's my current line of thinking- would it be possible for a superior intelligence to devise a model of physics that functions for 99.999% of observation, but is still flawed in such a way as to obscure the truth? What do Jews say about their supposed superior intelligence? Who gave us general relativity? Why does the surname Stein seem to be connected to so many of our current worldly problems?
That’s your argument?
“I’m right because all of history is wrong!”
That is the most arrogant argument I have ever heard. That’s as arrogant as commies saying: “well that wasn’t real communism! I can do better!”
you argument is taking a demonstrably fabricated history and using it as some sort of proof of a moving North Star. you have 0 physical evidence of it having ever moved. and then you use NASA, an organization made up of freemasons and nazis as evidence that it will be moving in the future too. we just need to wait 13000 years kek.
and you call me arrogant. perhaps you need a mirror.
“Demonstrably fabricated history”
Prove that history has been fabricated. Every argument for this that I’ve heard so far assumes it’s own premise. No, you may not invoke Freemasons (not without evidence). No, you may not call me uneducated or deluded just because I don’t buy your story.
I did not say anything about the North Star changing, that was someone else in this thread. Though his theory is plausible since Earth’s axis precesses over time.
“NASA, an organization of Freemasons and Nazis”
Just because an organization is partially made up of such people does not mean their statements are wrong. This is an inverse of the appeal to authority fallacy. A theory’s plausibility is independent of its source.
No flat earther has ever demonstrated what said Freemasons gain by lying about the shape of the earth. Round earth does not disprove God, creation, or the Bible.
Round earth advocates gladly publish all their findings and evidence for the public to check out. People who aren’t Freemasons or Nazis have double checked the work and it all checks out. Kind of hard to lie to people when your research is open source.
Arguing with you is clearly going to get me nowhere but ill do my best again anyway.
You want me to prove that history has been fabricated? Lets start with world war 2 if you'd like.
https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv
watch that and then reevaluate what you think you know about the world. If they can make you believe a fake reality about events as recent as 100 years ago, imagine what they'll make you believe about stuff from thousands of years ago.
1- the organization is not just made up of these types of people, it was founded by them. They are the progenitors. Its akin to trusting the mafia because they inducted some regular citizens.
2- We dont have to demonstrate the pros and cons of their agenda of lies. what good would that do anybody? it would be a waste of time. Your repeated mention of it right now is a waste of time. The WHY holds no importance.
3- Round earth advocates to this day, are unable to demonstrate any sort of curvature of the earths surface, other than through photos from NASA; an organization started by Nazi scientists and Freemasonic cult followers. Do you see why I dont trust them? Would you use a Nigerian prince as your source of proof for how big that check you want me to cash for you is? Similarly, the motion of earth has never been demonstrated by anyone (because it cant be). So the "Trust the science!" crowd can publish all the findings they want. And more "Trust the science!" people can go ahead and confirm their findings. Just like they did with the covid vaccine. None of those people have been or will be going to space.