666 does not appear 50 times. 0.666, 66,600, and 66.6 are not 666. 3 6’s appearing in sequence has no significance whatsoever.
50 times, out of how many other measurements we’ve taken in the solar system, much less the observable universe?
You’re not engaging in pattern recognition, you’re grasping at straws desperately trying to prove a failed theory.
The fact that Freemasons have infiltrated our government doesn’t mean that everything they say is a lie. It’s not beneficial for them to lie about something unless it gets them something in return. Especially about round earth, which if it were false would be trivially easy to disprove, and we wouldn’t have this discussion.
I dont have a theory to prove. You do. your theory is that the earth is a ball hurdling through an infinite vacuum. You have no physical evidence you can provide to me to support that theory.
I could show you the list of 50+ instances in which 666 or some variation thereof is prominently shown in measurements of the moon, earth curvature, etc but I dont think youre really interested in that. You seem to enjoy satanic math and fairytales.
choosing to trust people that are deceptive half the time is retarded, no matter the topic. saying "theres no benefit to lying about the shape of the earth" isnt an argument. Its your opinion from your limited perspective. I already said, proving the globular earth incorrect is a rather easy task for some with honest discernment. That is the precise reason we are having this discussion.
Do you think I want to believe the earth is not a ball and be called every name imaginable for this heretical belief? In your own words, "Whats the benefit to me?" I am this way because it is the observational truth, so im committed to it as are many other so called "flat earthers." The same way youre committed to the musings of Freemasons and satanists.
Yes, you do. If you prefer flat earth over round earth, it’s your job to show evidence that your theory is correct. If you want to assert that space and round earth are fairytales, it’s your job to prove it.
The earth doesn’t “hurdle” through the vacuum, it is in a well defined and stable orbit around the sun. Strawman arguments aren’t your friend.
I have no physical evidence?!? I have literally provided evidence throughout this entire thread. You just disregard the evidence because it doesn’t fit your theory. Which is the exact same mistake that the evolutionists make.
“Some variation of” 666 is not the same as 666. 0.666, 66,600, and 66.6 are not the same and have no spiritual or religious significance. And even if all 50 measurements you allege really were 666, what percentage is the 50 measurements out of the total? There are tens of thousands of objects in the solar system each with their own axial tilt, orbital velocity, and curvature. It is statistically guaranteed that some numbers are going to have multiple 6’s in them.
I don’t choose to trust the scientists who say that the earth is round. I study the evidence that they provide and decide for myself whether it makes sense and corresponds with reality. Their arguments on Covid jabs and evolution don’t hold up to scrutiny, so I don’t believe them. The arguments for a flat earth also don’t add up, so I don’t believe it. The arguments for a round earth do make sense and are coherent, so that’s why I believe a round earth.
Your insistence that round earthers are deluded and don’t follow evidence is called “projection”
If proving a flat earth is so easy, why do flat earthers keep accidentally proving the earth is round?
“I am this way because it’s the observational truth”
No, you’re not. Flat earthers are the way they are for two reasons:
They have an insatiable desire to have “secret knowledge” that everyone else is too stupid to grasp. This stems from an inferiority complex due to not understanding basic science.
They are CIA operatives sent to sow division in TDW and GAW and delegitimize both groups by conflating them with irrational gobbledygook.
If you’re going to accuse me of loving Freemasons and satanism, then I’m going to accuse you of being a CIA operative. Or a complete moron, your pick.
you sound like a youtube warning under a flat earth and Q video lol. you haven't provided evidence of anything. certainly not of earths curvature lmao.
I have no theory. my theory is that we are being lied to. I dont know what the shape of the earth is. neither do you. You think you Do, but you dont. There are glaring holes in the globe earth theory that we are all taught. Therefore, I do not take it to be true. That doesnt mean that I have a theory for our existence. In essence, you are the one with the theory. The theory of a globular earth.
earth is in stable orbit around the sun. sun is in stable orbit around the galactic center. galactic center is in stable orbit relative to all other galactic centers. Indeed, according to your model, the earth is hurdling through an infinite vacuum at over 1 million mph. not sure how you fail to understand what I said.
lastly, im not arguing for the earth to be one thing or another. im simply refuting that what we are taught it is, it is not. call me whatever name you want, doesnt really change anything. you sit here telling me I have a need to be in possession of secret knowledge while at the same time you think im secretly a CIA agent. Perhaps it is you who clings to the desire for knowing secrets, ya?
The earth is curved. It has been proven by every observation in existence. Flat earthers themselves have proved it. It’s not my fault you’re too lazy to see the evidence for yourself.
“I have no theory. My theory is…”
You’re a retard. You admit that you have a theory, and my point is that if you have a theory, you better damn well provide evidence for it. Shrieking that everyone else but you is a liar is not evidence.
“There are glaring holes in the globe earth theory.”
Then show the holes. So far every “hole” in the theory stems from flat earthers being entirely ignorant of the science they are so quick to dismiss. If you’re going to dismiss something, at least try to understand it first so that you can refute it effectively.
Your third paragraph is remarkably accurate. I don’t see why you think it’s so preposterous.
“I’m not arguing for earth to be one thing or another”
Yes you are, you are arguing that the earth isn’t round. That is a pitiful excuse for not having to provide evidence, facts, or reason. You clearly did not anticipate having to actually defend your position.
Also, I didn’t say that you were a CIA agent. My point is that if you’re going to accuse me of liking Freemasons and satanic math without evidence, then I’m going to accuse you of being a CIA agent without evidence. If you don’t like that, then change how you debate.
So nuts? Why not flat planets or oblong because turned? Why is the earth’s shadow curved on the moon? You got barely watched YT vids and nothing more. Good grief.
666 does not appear 50 times. 0.666, 66,600, and 66.6 are not 666. 3 6’s appearing in sequence has no significance whatsoever.
50 times, out of how many other measurements we’ve taken in the solar system, much less the observable universe?
You’re not engaging in pattern recognition, you’re grasping at straws desperately trying to prove a failed theory.
The fact that Freemasons have infiltrated our government doesn’t mean that everything they say is a lie. It’s not beneficial for them to lie about something unless it gets them something in return. Especially about round earth, which if it were false would be trivially easy to disprove, and we wouldn’t have this discussion.
I dont have a theory to prove. You do. your theory is that the earth is a ball hurdling through an infinite vacuum. You have no physical evidence you can provide to me to support that theory.
I could show you the list of 50+ instances in which 666 or some variation thereof is prominently shown in measurements of the moon, earth curvature, etc but I dont think youre really interested in that. You seem to enjoy satanic math and fairytales.
choosing to trust people that are deceptive half the time is retarded, no matter the topic. saying "theres no benefit to lying about the shape of the earth" isnt an argument. Its your opinion from your limited perspective. I already said, proving the globular earth incorrect is a rather easy task for some with honest discernment. That is the precise reason we are having this discussion.
Do you think I want to believe the earth is not a ball and be called every name imaginable for this heretical belief? In your own words, "Whats the benefit to me?" I am this way because it is the observational truth, so im committed to it as are many other so called "flat earthers." The same way youre committed to the musings of Freemasons and satanists.
“I don’t have a theory to prove”
Yes, you do. If you prefer flat earth over round earth, it’s your job to show evidence that your theory is correct. If you want to assert that space and round earth are fairytales, it’s your job to prove it.
The earth doesn’t “hurdle” through the vacuum, it is in a well defined and stable orbit around the sun. Strawman arguments aren’t your friend.
I have no physical evidence?!? I have literally provided evidence throughout this entire thread. You just disregard the evidence because it doesn’t fit your theory. Which is the exact same mistake that the evolutionists make.
“Some variation of” 666 is not the same as 666. 0.666, 66,600, and 66.6 are not the same and have no spiritual or religious significance. And even if all 50 measurements you allege really were 666, what percentage is the 50 measurements out of the total? There are tens of thousands of objects in the solar system each with their own axial tilt, orbital velocity, and curvature. It is statistically guaranteed that some numbers are going to have multiple 6’s in them.
I don’t choose to trust the scientists who say that the earth is round. I study the evidence that they provide and decide for myself whether it makes sense and corresponds with reality. Their arguments on Covid jabs and evolution don’t hold up to scrutiny, so I don’t believe them. The arguments for a flat earth also don’t add up, so I don’t believe it. The arguments for a round earth do make sense and are coherent, so that’s why I believe a round earth.
Your insistence that round earthers are deluded and don’t follow evidence is called “projection”
If proving a flat earth is so easy, why do flat earthers keep accidentally proving the earth is round?
“I am this way because it’s the observational truth”
No, you’re not. Flat earthers are the way they are for two reasons:
If you’re going to accuse me of loving Freemasons and satanism, then I’m going to accuse you of being a CIA operative. Or a complete moron, your pick.
you sound like a youtube warning under a flat earth and Q video lol. you haven't provided evidence of anything. certainly not of earths curvature lmao.
I have no theory. my theory is that we are being lied to. I dont know what the shape of the earth is. neither do you. You think you Do, but you dont. There are glaring holes in the globe earth theory that we are all taught. Therefore, I do not take it to be true. That doesnt mean that I have a theory for our existence. In essence, you are the one with the theory. The theory of a globular earth.
earth is in stable orbit around the sun. sun is in stable orbit around the galactic center. galactic center is in stable orbit relative to all other galactic centers. Indeed, according to your model, the earth is hurdling through an infinite vacuum at over 1 million mph. not sure how you fail to understand what I said.
lastly, im not arguing for the earth to be one thing or another. im simply refuting that what we are taught it is, it is not. call me whatever name you want, doesnt really change anything. you sit here telling me I have a need to be in possession of secret knowledge while at the same time you think im secretly a CIA agent. Perhaps it is you who clings to the desire for knowing secrets, ya?
The earth is curved. It has been proven by every observation in existence. Flat earthers themselves have proved it. It’s not my fault you’re too lazy to see the evidence for yourself.
“I have no theory. My theory is…”
You’re a retard. You admit that you have a theory, and my point is that if you have a theory, you better damn well provide evidence for it. Shrieking that everyone else but you is a liar is not evidence.
“There are glaring holes in the globe earth theory.”
Then show the holes. So far every “hole” in the theory stems from flat earthers being entirely ignorant of the science they are so quick to dismiss. If you’re going to dismiss something, at least try to understand it first so that you can refute it effectively.
Your third paragraph is remarkably accurate. I don’t see why you think it’s so preposterous.
“I’m not arguing for earth to be one thing or another”
Yes you are, you are arguing that the earth isn’t round. That is a pitiful excuse for not having to provide evidence, facts, or reason. You clearly did not anticipate having to actually defend your position.
Also, I didn’t say that you were a CIA agent. My point is that if you’re going to accuse me of liking Freemasons and satanic math without evidence, then I’m going to accuse you of being a CIA agent without evidence. If you don’t like that, then change how you debate.
So nuts? Why not flat planets or oblong because turned? Why is the earth’s shadow curved on the moon? You got barely watched YT vids and nothing more. Good grief.