Nope, screeching halt - even if he is their bio-child, he would have zero claim to the throne because they were not married when he was born and he is therefore illegitimate.
An heir must be "legitimate issue" of the monarch, and he would not be.
Weird. Read a post yesterday about Nostradamus predicting the Queen’s death. He got it right as to the timing. His next prediction was that Charles would pass quickly, 4 yrs., and a “man who was never meant to be king would be crowned”. Very interesting because it would probably take 4 yrs to get the DNA test done. Fascinating!
Nope, screeching halt - even if he is their bio-child, he would have zero claim to the throne because they were not married when he was born and he is therefore illegitimate.
An heir must be "legitimate issue" of the monarch, and he would not be.
if it proves to be true, it could put King Charles on the spot - the world will see how he treats him...
Who cares is the answer. Let the national enquirer sort that out. What we should care about is the fact we still have kings and queens.
no because he would be a illegitimate son
diana was princess and her children are recognized
Some of you have been reading the Nostradamus book, which alleges that Charles will abdicate in favor of someone who was not expected.
If it's this guy, his wife is aboriginal.
And Meghan will lose her race card.
Bring it on!
If he is illegitimate than he has no claim to the thrown at all. In all of history children born outside of marriage have never had the same rights.
William the Conquerer comes to mind...
Fork'n bastard!
Weird. Read a post yesterday about Nostradamus predicting the Queen’s death. He got it right as to the timing. His next prediction was that Charles would pass quickly, 4 yrs., and a “man who was never meant to be king would be crowned”. Very interesting because it would probably take 4 yrs to get the DNA test done. Fascinating!