Translation: It was a polite response not from Abe, but from his ambassador.

Presidents usually reply to letters via their ambassadors / secretaries. It has to receive the approval of the president before it gets sent. Presidents (especially back then) are usually too busy to read and write their own mail. They often had someone read it to them and they would dictate a response rather than writing it. Which still gets rubber-stamped by them before it gets sent.

You can read the original letter here: https://archive.org/details/karlmarxcivilwa00schl/page/12/mode/2up

Or also in the link posted by OP: https://www.marxists.org/history/international/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm

Translation: Abe and Marx never met each other, but that does not stop those who want to smear to find connections like this. I am assuming this was the best connection they could dig up.

They didn't need to meet personally. Abe had handlers who worked for the Rothschilds, just like Marx did. As briefly mentioned in the above pamphlet entitled "Karl Marx and the Civil War," Garibaldi and Mazzini were two Masonic revolutionaries that spearheaded the abolitionist movement and they also were associated with the committee of socialists and revolutionaries which Marx wrote on behalf of. In other words, the Rothschilds had these two agents operating on both sides of the pond, so Marx and Lincoln were joined at the hip anyway, despite never having met in person.

For more documentary evidence, see The Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins (1987): https://archive.org/details/mullins-e.-c.-the-curse-of-canaan-1987/page/146/mode/2up

but their affinities led to what Blackburn calls an “unfinished revolution”

Whoever Blackburn is, its his opinion, and his opinion is not much worth for us.

Actually, this is an important admission. This is communist codespeak for the revolution we're seeing unfolding right now. The Civil War was just the beginning. As admitted in a Soviet training for brainwashing America discovered in the 1960s, America was intended as the initial stage for the first communist revolution in the world. The Civil War was intended to facilitate this effort. But it didn't happen fast enough and Russia became the stage instead. But now, here in the 20th-century, we're seeing all the corruptions resulting from the Civil War culminating in the chaos we're seeing now.

Blackburn's book is interesting in its own right, although he's a commie author himself: https://www.amazon.com/Unfinished-Revolution-Karl-Abraham-Lincoln/dp/1844677222/

(But sometimes, commies admit intriguing things too, which we should all know here)

I linked you to several documents containing them. Read them for yourself:

• https://archive.org/details/karlmarxcivilwa00schl

• https://www.marxists.org/history/international/iwma/documents/1864/lincoln-letter.htm

We all know the real goal of the Cabal was to break up US in the Civil war, and whether you hate him or love him, he foiled their plan and pushed back their agenda by another 100 years at least.

Not true at all. Just as Marx says in his letter congratulating Lincoln on his re-election: "If resistance to the Slave Power was the reserved watchword of your first election, the triumphant war cry of your re-election is Death to Slavery."

This was again codespeak for something beyond its surface meaning. In fact, Marx was alluding to Lincoln's genocide of the South which actually occurred during the Civil War and Lincoln's re-election. Marx was congratulating Lincoln on genociding the people of the South. Even the infamous Union general William Tecumseh Sherman admitted, after the war, that the form of warfare that he had waged against the South violated the rules of war that had been taught at West Point. Lincoln's war policy also violated the rules of civilized warfare that had long been accepted by European nations.

Okay, we are getting more juicy material here. Read between the lines and you will see that Marx was one of the people who twisted the situation to force Lincoln into the civil war.

Lincoln wasn't forced into the Civil War at all. For some good reading material on this issue:

• https://healthwyze.org/political-articles/838-the-whitewashed-tyranny-of-abraham-lincoln

Tsar stood up to them but eventually succumbed, but good ole Abe managed to prevail.

You're correct about the Czar, but Lincoln was not the guy that "managed to prevail." He realized that he'd been used by the war's end, and between him paving the way for central banks and corporatizing Congress, the bankers realized it was too sweet of a deal to let anything jeopardize it, so they killed off their pet. Lincoln began to resent the control he'd been placed under, although he had followed their orders for many years.

Read this carefully. All they have to offer is "met Marx in 1848" to make it sound like Abe had a hardcore commie in his administration.

Lincoln had many hardcore commies in his administration. For a good book on this facet of this issue:

• https://www.amazon.com/Red-Republicans-Lincolns-Marxists-Marxism/dp/0595446981

Folks, this is an excellent exercise in understanding what "Fake News" means and in how many different flavours it comes in. This kind of rubbish should be nipped in the bud.

Although the WaPo is pure shit, this article and the other links represent an important admission about Lincoln being bad for America. There are lots of other things to prove this fact, but you'll have to be able to throw off your idolatry of Lincoln before opening your eyes to this truth.

Ultimately it requires a holistic view of history to understand why Abraham Lincoln is not the hero that modern Americans have made him out to be. For some extra material on this, here you go:

• https://miketgriffith.com/files/chamberlain.htm
• https://miketgriffith.com/files/4claims.htm
• https://miketgriffith.com/files/southernside.htm