Responding to an NPC is not futile, as there are often countless silent lurkers reading your posts. Here are some responses to common attacks to the Q movement.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 HANDY RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
The point is that he wasnt anything else - it was a statue celebrating his contributions to Freemasonry. Why not just go read morals and dogma?
It’s freely available for you so you can get a measure of Albert Pike.
Calling being anti Masonic bigotry? Pfft
Well, if it’s wrong to be bigoted against secretive societies run by the upper echelons of society who worship Lucifer then yes, I guess I’m a rancid bigot. Just as in the same way I’ma rancid transphobe for not wanting little kids to be butchered and drugged or a rotten racist for not wanting to exterminate white people.
Get a clue
Albert Pike was more than a Freemason. Just as George Washington was more than a Freemason. So, you are good with the destruction of all George Washington memorials? Including the Washington monument? And his face on Mount Rushmore?
Masons worship Lucifer? Sauce, much? Yeah, you Are a "rancid bigot." At least you admit it. (I'm not interested in transphobes or racists for purposes of this exchange. Cute distraction, though.)
Listen, the statue was a statue COMMEMORATING PINES FREEMASONRY.
You’re just being wilfully blind and wilfully ignorant. Your choice of course but I think it’sa stupid choice and does you no favours at all
You don't have to yell to make an irrelevant point. You, on the other hand, are blind to my points. You don't address them at all, as though by not doing so you can pretend they didn't exist. Well, too bad. Those are the objections I have and since you have no interest in countering them, I feel justified in maintaining them. It is pretty clear that when (1) you have no response, and (2) you resort to verbal abuse, you have lost the argument.
You are the one saying that there’s nothing wrong with Albert Pike and that Freemasons don’t worship Lucifer on those levels. But how them do you contend with this quote from Morals and Dogma?
LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darknesss! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, sensual or selfish Souls ? Doubt it not!
Sauce? I told you to go read morals and dogma
Oh. A reading assignment. On the basis of which no one else in the world seems to be convinced. Which you don't seem disposed to reconcile with the character of George Washington. That's a big stumbling block, you know.