Anarchy is simply a tool to tear down the status quo, not a government type. Proof of this is how the left uses anarchy today.
I would argue that the individuals who claim to be "anarchists" and act by looting cities and causing violence are, in fact, not anarchists at all. They are tools, as you say, by the George Soros types to instill fear (they are terrorists) and to get people to equate "anarchy" with "chaos."
In fact, today we are witnessing "government" being the same thing as "chaos," due to the complete lack of respect for Rule of Law.
A free society must respect Rule of Law, no matter how that society is structured, and whether or not it has a government.
Socialists, communists, fascists, and these fake anarchists all refuse to respect the Rule of Law -- as does the FJB administration.
What made America different was an establishment of, and respect for, Rule of Law.
And by "Rule of Law," I do not mean anything the dictator says is the rules. I mean what the founders meant: a respect for Natural Law, meaning a respect for cause-and-effect as "the laws of Nature and of Nature's God" dictate.
I would argue that the individuals who claim to be "anarchists" and act by looting cities and causing violence are, in fact, not anarchists at all.
Consider the old saying "Scratch a liberal and you'll find an authoritarian," you could also add "Scratch an anarchist and you'll find a phony."
In fact, today we are witnessing "government" being the same thing as "chaos," due to the complete lack of respect for Rule of Law.
You'll find every authoritarian leader never really cares about their professed ideologies or the government body, only their image. You see it today in the way the CCP is very sensitive to criticism from abroad. They activate Lebron James or they shame John Cena. As our earthly gods, they must be adored.
Socialists, communists, fascists, and these fake anarchists all refuse to respect the Rule of Law -- as does the FJB administration.
Related to the previous point, grassroots supporters of revolution don't really believe their own ideology and whatever new order it brings, they're just banking on being part of a privileged class during post-revolution. But in all these revolutions, those are the first people to get slaughtered by the communist dictators. Lenin's first purges were of the workers unions who supported him.
And by "Rule of Law," I do not mean anything the dictator says is the rules. I mean what the founders meant: a respect for Natural Law, meaning a respect for cause-and-effect as "the laws of Nature and of Nature's God" dictate.
One significant difference between the left and right is that the right understands the difference between order and authoritarianism while the left does not. Order is having a referee on the field. Authoritarianism is the ref scripting the game.
I would argue that the individuals who claim to be "anarchists" and act by looting cities and causing violence are, in fact, not anarchists at all. They are tools, as you say, by the George Soros types to instill fear (they are terrorists) and to get people to equate "anarchy" with "chaos."
In fact, today we are witnessing "government" being the same thing as "chaos," due to the complete lack of respect for Rule of Law.
A free society must respect Rule of Law, no matter how that society is structured, and whether or not it has a government.
Socialists, communists, fascists, and these fake anarchists all refuse to respect the Rule of Law -- as does the FJB administration.
What made America different was an establishment of, and respect for, Rule of Law.
And by "Rule of Law," I do not mean anything the dictator says is the rules. I mean what the founders meant: a respect for Natural Law, meaning a respect for cause-and-effect as "the laws of Nature and of Nature's God" dictate.
Agreed. Good post.
Consider the old saying "Scratch a liberal and you'll find an authoritarian," you could also add "Scratch an anarchist and you'll find a phony."
You'll find every authoritarian leader never really cares about their professed ideologies or the government body, only their image. You see it today in the way the CCP is very sensitive to criticism from abroad. They activate Lebron James or they shame John Cena. As our earthly gods, they must be adored.
Related to the previous point, grassroots supporters of revolution don't really believe their own ideology and whatever new order it brings, they're just banking on being part of a privileged class during post-revolution. But in all these revolutions, those are the first people to get slaughtered by the communist dictators. Lenin's first purges were of the workers unions who supported him.
One significant difference between the left and right is that the right understands the difference between order and authoritarianism while the left does not. Order is having a referee on the field. Authoritarianism is the ref scripting the game.