A simple explanation of how "The Scientific Method" has changed from Then to Now....
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 TRUTH PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
It would be unethical to perform such an experiment on people. You'd have to have a compelling reason to do so. The bar would be pretty high to get such research approved.
Clearly your opinion on ethics is vastly different than that of the entire medical industry.
But regardless, I'm going to continue demanding proof that this thing that has never even been isolated in order to be identified is what is causing a certain kind of sickness.
They exist. I have isolated them and worked with them myself. We keep vials of them in the freezer.
Nonsense. Your vials contain decomposed green monkey kidney particles and other bio-particulates from the FBS or vero cell substitute.
Nobody in the history of science has ever "ISOLATED" a virus, assuming we agree to the standard definition of the word "isolate" - which virologists have deceptively changed to perform their black magic.
Until somebody can actually FIND/SEE/LOCATE a "virus" DIRECTLY in the fluids/tissue of a diseased specimen, there will never be any such feat known as "virus isolation". Because there's no such thing.
You've been fooled AspenHome. And I do realize that's easier to fool you than to convince you that you've (as well as all your colleagues and anybody who truly BELIEVES they work with viruses) been fooled.
I have examined the process virologists use to "isolate" them. What is your process?
They are simple and robust little demons. If we want to make lots of a mammalian virus, we take a tiny pinch of pre-isolated virus from a vial in the freezer or introduce its genes separately via plasmids into a layer of mammalian cells in culture. The pre- made virus will infect the cells, hijack the cells' machinery to replicate itself, and the cell culture medium will begin to load up with new virus particles. For the case when we have transfected the virus genes by way of electroporation or lipid vessicle method, the viral genes express inside the mammalian cell and the new virus will self assemble. When they emerge from the cell they begin infecting other cells and replicate. The cell culture medium then loads up with new virus particles. After all the feeder mammalian cells are dead, we take the loaded medium and freeze aliquots, or if we want a very pure isolate of virus, we use gradient centrifugation, remove the layer containing the pure virus with a pipet, then dialyze the virus particles into a different buffer of choice by way of a semi permeable membrane.
They've tried for decades, including trying to infect orphans with polio as recently as the 1950s in "cosmopolitan" New York City.
They gave up right after the great deception known as Ender's "Viral Culturing" knowing they could perform their black magic undetected giving them license to claim a new moral high-ground they previously could have cared less about.
There's no proof of anything known as a virus. It's all lies and it's easy to demonstrate. You can read EVERY SINGLE paper in the "official" published literature and prove the ongoing fraud underway.
And BTW, virologists haven't run any control experiments since Jon Enders in 1954. But hey, trust the {NON}-science, right?
I'd be happy to explain to you how you have no "professional experience" with any viruses if you're interested in learning. Granted, I realize that you certainly BELIEVE you've worked with viruses, as do your professors/co-workers/colleagues, etc. There's a big difference.