43
posted ago by sleepydude ago by sleepydude +43 / -0

Everyone's really involved with the fact that "election company head is going down for having data on Chinese servers" but people are missing the specific detail involved and not talking about the modus operandi.

It's not that he's getting gibbed for changing votes or anything like that.

Instead, he's going down for having poll worker's information on Chinese servers.

That's a very different situation.

What we are about to discover through this case isn't something we already know about companies like Dominion or crooked election managers.

This is a little more in-depth.

This is about to reveal an intricate BLACKMAIL scheme that China is/has been undertaking as it pertains to those who COUNT THE VOTES in national elections worldwide.

That's something we've not had a smoking gun on yet.

So, make sure to point out that distinction in your discussions. This is something new here. This case is about to definitively show that China(and others) have a matrix willing to collect data on our election workers and use that date to threaten, bribe, blackmail, and coerce American Citizens in order to subvert the electoral process.

Furthermore, the data in question can be acquired through discovery in this case against Konnech and Eugene Yu will establish a base of people (the election workers) who now have grounds to pursue a class-action lawsuit against Konnech for mishandling of their sensitive personal information which led to measurable endangerment of them and their families.

That data necessarily must be released for these people to form their civil cases, so it's a big hurdle for the DeepState to try to stamp down. They can't hide behind "top secret" when a class action is breathing down the neck of the national archives.

This is a far more intricate avenue that hasn't been pursued yet and strikes at the heart of the specific actors who may or may not have subverted the electoral process.

TL;DR: This election-centric case is new stuff. We've got tons of smoking guns on the machines swapping/deleting votes, but we don't have anything to prove motive on behalf of the election workers engaged in the swapping/deleting of votes. If we can prove that all election workers are provably compromised in some way, and that there is more than a reasonable doubt they've been coerced in some way by foreign actors, then we've got a big case that can't be swept under the rug because it's not purely political but also points towards a basis for class-action civil cases on extortion.