At that time I was reading up on the post/comments here but now I don't remember if there was any consensus as to the legitimacy of those posts. And maybe it's not possible to determine 100% whether it was or wasn't the Q team who posted.
The posts started on Jun 24, the date Roe v. Wade was overturned. And I guess at that time someone noticed 11.3 in some Roe v. Wade legal documents. So if 11.3 is a reference to Roe v. Wade then most likely no one would have associated 11.3 with Roe v. Wade without those Q posts showing up.
The writing style is entirely different. For instance, hey guys look what a friend of mine did!
Also the Q that is suspected to be a fake did not have the correct trip code.
However this person was allowed to set up their own truth social account with a single letter of the alphabet as the account name, which apparently is against the rules. I don't know what kind of fuckery is that.
Different encodings have a bunch of characters that appear to be blank when converted to UTF-8. Not saying that’s the case here, but that does make it plausible.
Fake and gay I believe after being silent for years you would have thought he had something important to say.
He didn't.
No proofs.
Yeah, certainly possible. But just the fact of the post happening on the same day as Roe v Wade is what caused people to see the 11.3 in the Roe v Wade legal documents. Now maybe someone was reading over the Roe v Wade legal documents and noticed 11.3 and figured they would play a joke on the Q community and post as Q. But it certainly seems that no association between 11.3 and Roe v Wade would have been made without those Q posts.
Nah I bet Jim does know.
Eta: Yeah, so when Jim said this was Q, because he verified it?