https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03206-5
Sorry in advance, I know it's dumb and it's a blip on the bullshit gaslight bait radar, but does anyone make anything of this?
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Dragons are associated with the devil/demonic stuff. I read a religious book that thinks the CERN is going to open a link between the underworld and our world. Not saying I believe it but I definitely see the devil in our world all around us. The democratic party is doing the devil's work every day. Scary and interesting times we find ourselves alive in.
Agree. CERN is a type of Stargate.
CERN is a physics experiment. Stargate is a science FICTION television program. It’s time to learn the difference…
Yes, science fiction, but the laws of physics apply. Concepts and ideas considered science fiction in literature many years ago (Jules Verne to Michael Crichton) are now, in some cases, a reality.
Lol ooooo spooooky cern demons.
Holy balls man, this "reasoning" is why people are in the predicament they are today.
Sad you won't find out the truth about dragons because you're all wadded up in superstition. Don't let symbolism be your downfall. Take control of your own mind and see through the crap they've been presenting to humanity for ages.
In comms, dragons are used to describe a team working together. The cabal/illuminati/elite are only elite because the rest of humanity doesn't see, understand or believe how they network and form teams to manipulate us. This story reads like a wise old cabalist explaining to a younger problematic one how they have to keep their machinations, their "dragon-ness," secret in order to avoid being hunted and killed by the rest of humanity if they get caught.
The repeated mention of atomic measurements and sensors makes it sound like some smart scientists have become bold in declaring the BS of string theory and other comms that masquerade as science facts. Note: this doesn't mean all science is fake, it just means that just like news is fake, science news and discoveries are riddled with fakery, and uncovering the fakery leads to cabal conspiracies. For some logical reasons about why they invent fake science, check out the link in u/TheJake 's comment.
Could be a general warning, or it might be that they will shift away from science fakery and use a different mechanism, i.e., ride a different dragon. Interesting piece!
The title is a pun on a well-known book series, referenced in the bottom of the article by the writer.
As for dark matter, my 2c on the notion is that its an empirical fit to try and explain any discrepancies between what the universe-expansion type equations predict, and what is being observed more directly, in as much as one can observe things so far away and hence so long ago that we can only try and extrapolate to what is really there in that volume of space at the current time.
https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/hubble-constant-explained
Doesn't seem to touch on too many satanic themes, and to my way of thinking the article was seemingly written by a person with no grasp of the physics or whats happening at CERN at all.
Good catch, it's a literary nod. The draconic secrecy language of the thing, and CERN, made it a blip on my witchcraft radar.
The author does have a whimsical flowery booknerd hippy girl tone more so than a sinister methodical agent of the deep state or a degenerate cultist, or a scientist for that matter. Weird niche writing fangirl pseudo poetry about CERN.
Interesting to see the different angles of perspective people see shit from though. I tend to look for comms but I don't think this is comms, still, I will look up that book tomorrow and surface source the authorships here. Thanks.
That's a good characterization as to the tone of the article, light and bohemian. Interestingly, the authors name being a clickable object pops up that she actually has a masters in astrophysics.
Maybe thats why she got the nod to write the piece, but its somewhat odd that she didn't draw on the expertise that I presume she has, and that the intended audience of folks who might read Nature could relate to.
To diss CERN is to discern.
In 1897, mathematics instructor Charles Hinton designed a gunpowder-powered baseball pitching machine for the Princeton University baseball team's batting practice.
Hinton also wrote a series of books on the aspects of the fourth dimension. In one of his books he described what look more like a set of child's alphabet blocks, actually color coded objects that represent the tesseract, a fourth dimensional cube. He described that a person memorizing the set of 12 cubes, all of their faces and edges and points, can train his mind to perceive a fourth dimensional object. He also claimed a percentage of individuals attempting to do so had become mad.
I built that tesseract model to his exact specifications. Each of the faces and edges and points have their unique color and name. I may be one of the few people on the planet that possesses this particular hand built model as specified by Hinton.
I went so far as to build it many years ago, but I haven't taken the mental effort to memorize all the parts of what look like 12 separate colored cubes. If a person had never seen a cube, a three-dimensional cube, you could describe it as 6 flat squares connected by common edges. You can name the edges and faces and points and ask the person to figure out how they go together. If he's lucky his mind will assemble it in three-dimensional space and he would see it as a cube. Or maybe he would go mad in the process.
I bring this up because it makes it obvious that since there is a fourth dimension, it comprises an entire universe of objects and beings just a millimeter away from everything we know. We just don't have four dimensional eyes to see it. It's like an ant on the sidewalk that cannot see the skyscraper towering above it.
I'm sure when you go smashing atoms together, parts of them probably fly off into unseen dimensions. This would lead the CERN scientists to a more focused inquiry into what may lie in the fourth dimension. And there be dragons.
Weird Indeed!
Are they saying they are like the character Q in StarTrekTNG?
Sounds like Q in TNG.
Everyone can do this. Why is it so scary to people? Oh, that's right. Programming. Nvm. As you were.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/particle-physics-also-ukraine-invasion/
Can the downvoter here explain the downvote?
Or someone else that understands why this would be downvoted.
I read Decoding's work too. It's speculative and mind bending, but the coincidences exist and they do an exceptional job of spotlighting them, even if I am not willing yet to take that much world redefining as probable, or even plausible at the moment.